Search for: "Stone v. State" Results 1781 - 1800 of 2,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2010, 1:00 am by GuestPost
This commitment is evident in 6:3 decision of the US Supreme Court in NY Times v US, where the Court decided that the applicant could publish the then-classified Pentagon Papers. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:14 am by Kelly
Govt. launches massive operation to seize internet websites that are allegedly violating IPR laws (Spicy IP) (PlagiarismToday) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google – Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 12:55 pm by Jeff Gamso
  But as the state is silent, the defense proceeds. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 2:02 am by Marie Louise
(Internet Cases) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Crippen, Matthew – Judge in Xbox modding trial berates prosecution, halts trial (ArsTechnica) (WIRED) Harper, Whitney – Supreme Court refuses innocent infringement P2P case (ArsTechnica) Mick Haig Productions – EFF asks Judges to protect identities in porn-downloading lawsuits – Mick Haig Productions v Does 1-670 and Third World Media v Does 1-1243 (Electronic Frontier Foundation) Twentieth… [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:32 am by Steve Hall
That year, he famously wrote in dissent in Callins v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:29 am
However, many legal commentators have stated that Gawker had nowhere to run following a 1985 US Supreme Court decision of Harper & Row Publishers v Nation Enterprises which held that The Nation's unauthorized publication of a 400 word excerpt from an over 600 page autobiography of former President Ford did not qualify as fair use. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 6:08 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
He is a genuine American hero, fighting his way out in Korea, where he got a bronze star with V for valor. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 3:53 pm by Lawrence Solum
And in the political arena, the constitutional debates of the 1940s and '50s seem less relevant today than those of the Progressive era, when liberals first attacked the conservative Court as pro-business, and conservatives insisted that only the Court could defend liberty in the face of an out-of-control regulatory state. [read post]