Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan*"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 4,162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2008, 12:10 pm
Dwight Sullivan, a civilian appellate defense counsel in the Air Force Appellate Defense Division, noticed the omission. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:58 am
The settlement in Keepseagle v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 6:12 am
Weber, and Dharak V. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 2:46 pm
While a New York Court of Appeals ruling, People v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The case is Tafolla v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:00 am
Seeking relief from judgment from a tribunal other than the one that handed down the judgmentCherry v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 6:05 pm
That Thomas would overrule New York Times v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:42 am
The rare en banc vote was 7-5.The case is Francis v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 6:49 am
That case is Gallagher v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm
M’Intosh’s discovery doctrine in Wi Parata v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
‚¬ The resulting case,Grand Upright Music Ltd. v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:36 am
In Cummings v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:43 am
The case is Moll v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
" Citing Matter of Sullivan v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 160 AD3d 1395, the Appellate Division also rejected Petitioner's argument that SDHR was required to hold a hearing on her complaint before it could make a probable cause determination. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
" * See Matter of Sullivan v County of Rockland, 150 AD3d 743. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
" * See Matter of Sullivan v County of Rockland, 150 AD3d 743. [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
In other ECHR news, Chinmayi Sharma summarized the court’s ruling in Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:43 am
Some cases do not.The case is Johnson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 8:01 am
This time around, we have some en banc smackdowns on the issue of when you can sue the federal government over the religiously-motivated placement on the "no fly list"The case is Tanvir v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
" Citing Matter of Sullivan v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 160 AD3d 1395, the Appellate Division also rejected Petitioner's argument that SDHR was required to hold a hearing on her complaint before it could make a probable cause determination. [read post]
