Search for: "U. S. v. Mays" Results 1781 - 1800 of 7,529
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2020, 7:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Pavloff may have taken the position at her deposition that advising Am Trust (or Mr. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 6:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A motion to dismiss based on documentary evidence may be granted “where the documentary evidence utterly refutes plaintiff’s factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter oflaw” (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:40 am by sydniemery
Loewy’s article The Fourth Amendment as a Device for Protecting the Innocent is cited in the following article: William Hopchak, Carpenter v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
On this second day of this unusual May session, the justices will hear – literally, only hear – oral argument in USAID v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:23 am by Eric Goldman
May 1, 2020) Selected Related Posts About State Action Claims First Voters Reject Tulsi Gabbard, Then a Judge Does–Gabbard v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm by Josh Blackman
United States, 305 U.S. 382, 388 (1939) ("[I]t rests with Congress to determine not only whether the United States may be sued, but in what courts the suit may be brought. [read post]