Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 3,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2016, 8:27 am
United States Steel Corp., 134 S. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
In the United States, shareholder primacy continues to define the legal standard.[15] “While many deplored the disconnect between corporate power and social need, and CSR . . . became a more frequent discussion topic in corporate and academic circles, not many corporations acted meaningfully in pursuing CSR. [read post]
6 May 2014, 11:50 am
It is an oddly consoling aspect of the United States Supreme Court that we basically get the Justices we deserve. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 8:33 am
Hard-core separation of powers dorks will want to take a look at Doolin Security Savings Bank v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 7:56 am
The essay claims that the United States entered such a period after 9/11, and that we remain there still. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 4:36 am
This contrasts the approach taken in other former colonies such as Canada and the United States, which recognize a degree of Indigenous sovereignty stemming from the continued presence of Indigenous nations on the land which existed prior to colonization. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:55 pm
Here is the abstract: This article is a comparative study of United States Supreme Court Justice Breyer and Kagan’s methods of judicial interpretation. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 10:20 pm
§ 2254(d)(1) (hereinafter "the AEDPA standard"), which mandates that federal district courts reviewing a habeas corpus petition can rely only on Supreme Court case law to determine whether the petitioner's incarceration violates the United States Constitution. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:00 pm
In a Statement of Interest filed with the court on February 4, the Justice Department said: “Although the United States believes the parties have approached this effort in good faith and the amended settlement agreement is more circumscribed in its sweep than the original proposed settlement, the amended settlement agreement suffers from the same core problem as the original agreement: it is an attempt to use the class action mechanism to implement forward-looking… [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 4:10 am
This is a fact that any sentencing system, not just the United States Sentencing Guidelines, would take into account. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 12:03 pm
While this paper draws largely upon common law sources from the United States and Canada, metaphor provides a core form of cognitive scaffolding across legal traditions. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 4:10 pm
While this paper draws largely upon common law sources from the United States and Canada, metaphor provides a core form of cognitive scaffolding across legal traditions. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 2:47 am
Years ago, I wrote that the rise in gun ownership in the United States, including among minority gun owners, was strikingly out of sync with the Democratic talking point. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 10:19 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourt Circuit affirmed, requiring the insurance companies to provide a defense. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
This decision, as well as the Court of Appeal’s decision in Riley v Murray [2022] EWCA Civ 1146, provides an opportune moment to review the recent case law on section 3 and to assess how the courts have interpreted the three conditions at the core of the honest opinion defence. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:20 am
First, there is real opposition to the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 8:54 am
Holder (voting rights), and United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 4:51 pm
" Fashion Fabrics of Iowa v. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm
United Grain Growers Ltd., the Supreme Court of Canada stated, 91 The contract of employment has many characteristics that set it apart from the ordinary commercial contract. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 7:05 pm
In the EU and other jurisdictions outside the United States, the desirability and ideal design of private rights of action are currently matters of intense debates … The purpose of this paper is to examine the size and role played by private damages recoveries in antitrust suits directed at contemporary hard-core international price-fixing cartels. [read post]
