Search for: "Wells v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 1,913
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2010, 11:03 am
To use a well-known example, Justice Stevens’ dissent in Bowers v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 10:00 pm
It's an important social issue. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
“A Libel Story: Sullivan Then and Now,” Law & Social Inquiry (book review). [read post]
1 May 2010, 11:37 pm
STRICT AND INTENSIVE SUPERVISION AND TREATMENT In the United States Supreme Court case of Kansas V. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Garland also had the support of senior administration officials from the Reagan Justice Department, as well as that of Judge Laurence Silberman, who was appointed to the D.C. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
I’m sure as well that I’ll have updates to this analysis as I have the chance to reflect on it. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:44 am
Retirement Board’s failure to make an independent evaluation of an individual’s application for disability retirement fatal to the processSchlesinger v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 2010 NY Slip Op 20123, Decided on April 7, 2010, Supreme Court, Kings County, Judge Martin SchneierIn this Article 78 action Michael Schlesinger asked the court to annul, the action of the [New York City Employees’ Retirement System] denying his application for a disability… [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:21 pm
R. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:34 am
Fourth, if an individual is subject to a new order of a state regulator, then an alert is sent out to all other state regulators as well as FINRA through the CRD. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:18 pm
Fourth, for larger estates, a well-planned will can help reduce estate taxes. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 7:35 pm
The Agricultural Adjustment Act, famously upheld by the Supreme Court in Wickard v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
If the left is going to start executing hostages, well, the right had better do the same. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:12 pm
Posner wrote (on pages 209-10 of Overcoming Law): the University of Chicago Law School, where Strauss teaches, is one block east of the university's School of Social Service Administration, the nation's premier school of social work. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
Today I am testifying at an FCC hearing on “Serving the Public Interest in the Digital Era. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:01 pm
Did the insurer fail to account for a contrary decision by the Social Security Administrator that the claimant was disabled? [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 11:29 am
Whilst s.75, Social Security Administration Act 1992 did empower the authority to recover overpayments, it was required to do so within 6 years of the cause of action accruing by virtue of s.9, Limitation Act 1980. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 11:29 am
Whilst s.75, Social Security Administration Act 1992 did empower the authority to recover overpayments, it was required to do so within 6 years of the cause of action accruing by virtue of s.9, Limitation Act 1980. [read post]
