Search for: "York v York" Results 1781 - 1800 of 52,890
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
# # #DECISIONWhealon v Gramercy Park Residence Corp. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 10:52 am by Eric Goldman
For example, the Act would arguably permit a minor to create an account, subject to contract, with the New York Times, raising similar concerns to the ones involved in contract formation with Facebook, which the Act appears to target. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
”Despite having “hundreds” of other job openings, the Bank refused to consider that request, and the employee was eventually forced to resign.Since such conduct was believed to be violative of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the EEOC filed litigation (EEOC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
Sanctuary cities from Chicago to New York are actively trying to prevent new migrants from seeking sanctuary within their own borders. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
”Ironically, there’s no revisiting that, either.# # #DECISIONMatter of Daquana S. v Jeff M. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 10:10 am by Sherica Celine
AI Regulations Hit New York City Podcast Listen to attorney Ryan Kurtz of Patterson Belknap discuss New York City Regulations addressing the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in hiring workers. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:47 am by Dan Bressler
“Myovant shareholder lawsuit dismissed by federal judge” — “A federal judge in the US District Court, Southern District of New York, has dismissed a lawsuit brought by a shareholder – and putative class representative – of Myovant Sciences, a biopharmaceutical company that was acquired by its majority shareholder Sumitovant Biopharma in March 2023. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, "Due process requires that the * * * hearing be open to the press and public" [See Fitzgerald v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, "Due process requires that the * * * hearing be open to the press and public" [See Fitzgerald v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
BUT PROPERTY WAS PURCHASED “AS IS” ....After “228” acquired certain real property from “228A,” an action was filed in New York County Supreme Court asserting “negligence,” and “contract breach,” all due to a non-working elevator. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Nathan and Parker) rejects these arguments and the law stands.The case is Restaurant Law Center v. [read post]