Search for: "Application of Smith"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 7,621
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2020, 7:57 am
Smith, which held that the Free Exercise Clause does not entitle religious believers to exemptions from "neutral" and "generally applicable" laws. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:20 am
Stay tuned for a Reed Smith analysis detailing what you need to know to comply with the HHS interoperability and information blocking rules. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:50 am
Otherwise, PLLCs are governed by the same provisions of New York’s LLC Law applicable to non-professional LLCs. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:52 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc. holding that the appointment of Administrative Patent Judges (“APJs”) under the AIA violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 12:27 pm
The subcommittees will hear testimony from Wendin Smith, the former deputy assistant secretary of defense for countering weapons of mass destruction; Amb. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
In this context, the implication of the CGL decision is that the Indigenous laws underlying Aboriginal title and rights are left in an indefinite state of limbo, with their practical application in the Canadian legal regime denied. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
Smith — the landmark decision holding that the government can enforce laws that burden religious beliefs or practices as long as those laws are “neutral” or “generally applicable. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 2:14 am
James Prankerd Smith sets out the reasoning behind the Board of Appeal’s conclusions. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 1:17 am
Licensing schemes rejected Landlords are celebrating after two high profile landlord licensing schemes have been rejected by the government: Liverpool’s application to extend its citywide licensing scheme, and a similar application by Brent Council John Stewart, Policy Manager for the Residential Landlords Association, said: We all want to see bad landlords driven out of the sector. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:14 pm
appeared first on Cross and Smith. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am
Smith, which held that as a general matter, the … free-exercise clause provides no exemption from a generally applicable law, so long as the law wasn’t enacted to target religion. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 6:02 pm
In the recent case of Smith v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:25 am
Sineneng-Smith, a government appeal from a reversal of criminal convictions by the U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am
Sineneng-Smith, the court “seemed doubtful that a 1986 federal law that makes it a crime to ‘encourage’ unauthorized immigrants to come to or stay in the United States could be squared with the First Amendment. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 8:11 am
Smith. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
Sineneng-Smith, which asks whether a federal law making it a crime to encourage or cause illegal immigration for financial gain violates the First Amendment. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:33 pm
Smith, holding that the government can enforce laws that burden religious beliefs or practices as long as the laws are “neutral” or “generally applicable”; and whether the government violates the First Amendment when it makes participation by a religious social-services agency in the foster-care system contingent on actions and statements by the agency that conflict with the agency’s religious beliefs. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am
” But how would the approval of Diclegis, on the strength of a full new drug application, somehow support his claim anew? [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 11:25 am
Thus, the application is governed by paragraph 18. [read post]
