Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 9,566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2011, 1:00 am
— (1) DISCLOSURES MADE 1 YEAR OR LESS BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE FILING DATE OF THE CLAIMED INVENTION. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:05 am
One limitation is that an IPR petition must be filed within 1-year of the petitioner (or privy) being served with a complaint fo infringing the patent. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 1:27 pm
‘271(e)(1). [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:59 am
This time their capital gain does not reflect income that has already been taxed at the corporate level. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:39 am
The budget does not include funding for an alternate, interchangeable engine for the F-35. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:42 pm
§102 anticipation (does it already exist), rather than on 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:33 pm
The plain language of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:30 pm
According to APP: Even assuming Section 37 of the Act means what MDCO says (a question not yet briefed), Section 35 provides that it does not take effect for one year. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 7:23 am
In addition, the gift tax rate for 2010, 2011 and 2012 is 35%. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:34 pm
Specifically, the Commission determined to review: (1) the ALJ’s construction of the claim term “oven;” (2) the ALJ’s construction of the claim term “sawing;” (3) the ALJ’s determination that the accused process does not infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims 12, 15, 31-32, 34-35, and 38-39 of the ‘614 patent or claim 1 of the ‘942 patent; (4) the ALJ’s… [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:44 am
The statute, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 11:54 am
(emphasis added) The contributory infringement section of the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:50 pm
Second, it has a flat 20 percent tax on individual income that does not apply to personal dividend income. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 2:30 pm
" Id. col.1 ll.47-48. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm
” Therefore, according to the Court, “[i]t follows that filing a notice of exemption before project approval [is invalid and] does not begin the running of the 35-day limitations period set forth in [Public Resources Code ] section 21167, subdivision (d). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:28 pm
People may be joint inventors even though they do not physically work on the invention together or at the same time, and even though each does not make the same type or amount of contribution. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 6:03 pm
The filing of a motion for joinder does not except a petition from the statutory bar of § 315(a)(1). [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 1:03 am
Television broadcasting of a graphic user interface does not constitute communication to the public of a work protected by copyright within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:17 am
It does not matter that B filed first. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 10:42 am
” 35 U.S.C. 314. [read post]
