Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 3,413
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2015, 9:00 pm
If you finish an alcohol screening (1 hour meeting with a counselor who will recommend you attend 18, 32, or 54 hours of alcohol classes) you will be able to get a restricted license on day 31 of the suspension. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:00 pm
If you finish an alcohol screening (1 hour meeting with a counselor who will recommend you attend 18, 32, or 54 hours of alcohol classes) you will be able to get a restricted license on day 31 of the suspension. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:00 pm
If you finish an alcohol screening (1 hour meeting with a counselor who will recommend you attend 18, 32, or 54 hours of alcohol classes) you will be able to get a restricted license on day 31 of the suspension. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am
This does not create any new cause of action. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Boulanger, 2006 SCC 32, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 49, 210 C.C.C.(3d) 1. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 2:15 am
Nelson, 2006 WI App 124, 54, 294 Wis.2d 578, 718 N.W.2d 168 (Wisconsin Court of Appeals 2006). [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:07 pm
In this respect, Notice 2015-17’s transition relief only applies for the 2014 tax year to employer healthcare arrangements that are : Employer payment plans, as described in Notice 2013-54, if the plan is sponsored by an employer that is not an Applicable Large Employer (ALE) under Code § 4980H(c)(2) and §§54.4980H-1(a)(4) and -2; S corporation healthcare arrangements for 2-percent shareholder-employees; Medicare premium reimbursement arrangements; and… [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:57 pm
The outcome is a bit complex:1. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Id. at 54-55. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 12:31 pm
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Ajinomoto does not expand the tort of malicious falsehood any wider than that” [114]. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:03 am
“Thus, identifying Marley or whoever holds the rights to his persona in the alternative does not render the survey data useless or irrelevant. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:35 pm
Reform 1, 11-29 (2003). [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:04 pm
Example 1 — Post-Widowhood Remarriage. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
SECTION 1-201. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 2:46 pm
Regarding the Plaintiff’s challenge to the award of costs, Judge Rakoff found that “§ 3730(d)(4)’s limitation on the recovery of ‘attorneys’ fees and expenses’ does not bar an award of ‘costs’ under Rule 54 (d) (1). [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:36 am
The Court does not read Rule 63 to address the situation here, where Judge Murphy received the parties’ briefs, held a hearing, issued a written order ruling on the parties’ arguments and dismissing claims, and then left the bench. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:44 am
Excavator Co., 290 U.S. 240, 241, 54 S.Ct. 146, 146, 78 L.Ed. 293 (1933). [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:44 am
Excavator Co., 290 U.S. 240, 241, 54 S.Ct. 146, 146, 78 L.Ed. 293 (1933). [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
That responsibility remains a negligence duty of care, as eliminating the traditional negligence standard of proof would “ill-serve” the public:This consideration, however, does not justify the courts in lowering the standards of proof in tort cases of this kind. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:00 am
To a certain extent it does; there may be some cases where due diligence and a good defense could be established on affidavits, and those could be granted without a hearing. [read post]
