Search for: "In Re: CONTEMPT"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 3,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2012, 8:04 am
If you're thinking about being late to court, think about Mr. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
Photo credit: Alan Cleaver Related posts: Debts in bankruptcy and how they’re treated The most practical questions you likely have if you are... [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:38 pm
It realy is as if we're still in the 18th century, voting for our elective monarch, constrained in some ways to be sure (again, see previous post), but with remarkable freedom concerning administrative appointments (save, of course, for Senate confirmation, which blows hot and cold as a genuine way of checking egregious appointments). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:05 am
We're all the agents of that shame. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 7:43 am
You're not seeking a bar complaint, remember, much less an opportunity to rub elbows with Dickie Scruggs; you're merely trying to make a judge see you in a new light, so that he thinks twice the next time he's about to throw a file at you, or call you a moron in open court, or hold you in contempt because you've forgotten to show up a third time for the hearing on your opponent's motion to dismiss. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 7:43 am
You're not seeking a bar complaint, remember, much less an opportunity to rub elbows with Dickie Scruggs; you're merely trying to make a judge see you in a new light, so that he thinks twice the next time he's about to throw a file at you, or call you a moron in open court, or hold you in contempt because you've forgotten to show up a third time for the hearing on your opponent's motion to dismiss. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 5:51 pm
Debt collectors can sometimes use the court’s contempt powers to enforce their debts. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
About this time you’re probably wondering: I’ve seen this TV show somewhere — they’re supposed to read me something aren’t they? [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:54 am
I’m about to take an exam, the authors of which apparently have no idea what they’re doing. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:41 am
Both Biden and Ryan were passionate and friendly, treating each other with bemusement rather than contempt. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 8:11 am
Although we’re only starting to see these cases litigated in bulk, the litigation value of these cases can be extremely high. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
Top stories today via @edstoop @AndrewLuck23 # PA: Nemacolin Woodlands Resort reports security breach during summer http://t.co/0cJyiQ6H # Always Explain “Why” to the Judge – A Plaintiff brought a motion to compel “access to electronic records,” claiming … http://t.co/o2udLGkK # CFPB Study Assesses Differences in Credit Scores Sold to Consumers and Creditors http://t.co/vQeUDTXc # Ca: Student hacks into school board database http://t.co/f586l7bg # Nestlé… [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 11:04 am
In In re: Jada C.H., No. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
Case In Point - http://bit.ly/HM288p (Tom Fishburne) Technology and Tactics3 Steps for Compliance With the SEC’s Conflict Minerals Rule – http://bit.ly/P5E8g3 (Alexandra Wrange) An Interesting Framework For Information Governance - http://bit.ly/Tvbn2B (Barry Murphy) Big Data’s Human Component – Harvard Business Review - http://bit.ly/PeXS0G (Jim Stikeleather) DOJ Is Prosecuting Customs Fraud Through Sarbanes-Oxley’s… [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 1:52 pm
While the debt that you owe has been discharged as to the creditor, you’re probably still responsible for indemnifying your ex. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 1:52 pm
While the debt that you owe has been discharged as to the creditor, you’re probably still responsible for indemnifying your ex. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
When Asher refused, the judge sentenced her to 2 days in jail for contempt of court. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 1:33 pm
People write about what they're doing, where they're going, and how they're feeling - and some do so multiple times each day. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:35 pm
The video with the song re-appeared on YouTube. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:49 pm
The appellate court was asked to decide the following issues: (1) Whether the court was justified in modifying the parenting plan to provide Father with overnight visitation on Wednesday nights; and (2) Whether the court was justified in declining re-modification of the plan after Father shared a bed with his girlfriend (allegedly in contempt of court). [read post]
