Search for: "London v. State" Results 1801 - 1820 of 4,150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
In Sheraton Corporation of America v Sheraton Motels Ltd [1964] RPC 202, the US hotel chain had an arguable case to justify an interlocutory injunction against use of its mark; the goodwill was based on the fact that customers living in the United Kingdom booked rooms in the plaintiff’s hotels through the plaintiff’s London office or through UK-based travel agents. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
Hotak (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Kanu (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Johnson (Appellant) v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (Respondent)Crisis & Shelter, EHRC, SS for CLG interveners [2015] UKSC 30 The thing about the Supreme Court is that all those years of accrued, encrusted High Court and Court of Appeal case law just don’t matter. [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Haque v State of Victoria ([2015] VSCA 83) the Court of Appeal of Victoria dismissed an appeal in a “defamation by conduct” case arising out of the plaintiff’s arrest on the basis that the judge was right to hold that the relevant imputation was true. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:50 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Enter the entertaining case of Williamson v Khan. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am by Schachtman
Olah, “My Search for Carbocations and Their Role in Chemistry,” Nobel Lecture (Dec. 8, 1994), quoting George von Békésy, Experiments in Hearing 8 (N.Y. 1960); see also McMillan v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
 After all, "holiday" is no more than a state of mind, surely. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:39 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
The only alternative, a mass exodus out of London, already happening for many homelessness clients who can’t afford to rent there any more, despite the decision of Nzolomesa v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:18 am
 Pre-action disclosure is generally "desirable" where the information is only known to one of the parties (see XL London Market v Zenith [2004], Birse v HLC [2006] and Briggs v The Governors of Southfield School for Girls [2005]). [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:25 pm by Giles Peaker
Urban Lettings (London) Ltd v London Borough Of Haringey [2015] UKUT 104 (LC) What does an ‘appropriate person’ ‘having control of a HMO’ mean in circumstances where not all of the property making up the HMO is demised to one landlord? [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:12 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]