Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 42,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2011, 1:07 am
In a lengthy ruling issued late last month (Apr. 25, 2011), a federal judge in Miami granted BankAtlantic’s request for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
The fact that he only prolonged the stop by a few minutes did not matter. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:21 pm
There is no evidence regarding the defendant's financial position. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 4:11 pm
However, it is not clear that this has been anticipated or acknowledged by the rule makers and we think it a matter of public concern that rulings, required to be published under the Rules, may eventually be removed“. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
" Citing Matter of LaValley, 120 AD2d 1498, the court said that "in cases where the rendering of professional services is involved, an employment relationship can be found where there is substantial evidence of control over important aspects of the services performed other than results or means. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:30 am
" Citing Matter of LaValley, 120 AD2d 1498, the court said that "in cases where the rendering of professional services is involved, an employment relationship can be found where there is substantial evidence of control over important aspects of the services performed other than results or means. [read post]
2 May 2019, 7:16 am
The post Does Canadian Privacy Law Matter if it Can’t be Enforced? [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 12:09 pm
The court reviewed the rules of law concerning damages and held that substantial evidence supported the jury’s award. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 9:02 am
As an initial matter, it doesn’t have much to do with plain view. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 6:03 pm
One reason the rules often don't matter is because there is no practical method of enforcing them. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 1:27 pm
The court’s ruling is worth reading in full. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 9:27 am
Handling Employment-Related Matters in Pennsylvania Since 1991610-647-5027Gallagher Law Group, PC Malvern, Pa 19301 610-647-5027 E-Mail Questions or Comments to : jag@johnagallagher.com [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:00 am
Allowing employees to record conversations in secret, the policies explained, would deter employees from holding frank discussions about sensitive and confidential matters in the workplace. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:21 pm
In particular, evidence or convictions may, at times, be obtained at too high a price The post Entrapment Ruled Inapplicable in Canadian Terrorism Case first appeared on Robichaud's Criminal Lawyers. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 6:46 pm
The Court in this case has searched diligently through the facts and evidence to try and find if the weight of the evidence would substantiate a ruling by this Court that a burden of proof could be found from acts, circumstances and the entire history over a large portion of the decedent's life which would substantiate a ruling that she had actually and factually changed her domicile from New York City even though she might have been a resident of Wayne… [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
”Further, said the court, SUNY established, prima facie, its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with evidence showing that, while the plaintiff suffered from a disability related to surgery, he never proposed a reasonable accommodation that [SUNY] refused to make.As to plaintiff’s allegation concerning SUNY’s refusal to renew his term appointment, the Appellate Division said that SUNY had demonstrated, prima facie, that its action “not to renew the… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:23 pm
Through a host of legal doctrines (e.g., the harmless error rule and the prejudice prong of the Strickland test), the Court has repeatedly indicated that accuracy matters — convicted defendants do not get a new trial based on procedural irregularities unless there is a reason to think that the conviction might have been wrongful. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 8:00 am
The plaintiffs put on evidence that the new disclosure rule would require attorneys to violate the attorney–client privilege. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 8:00 am
The plaintiffs put on evidence that the new disclosure rule would require attorneys to violate the attorney–client privilege. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 7:25 am
Since the Hy-Brand case was vacated, the standard reverted to the Browning-Ferris definition, and the NLRB decided to tackle the matter with rulemaking instead of waiting for a new case to decide on the issue. [read post]
