Search for: "Owings v. Respondent" Results 1801 - 1820 of 2,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am by Tobias Thienel
The respondent in the English proceedings, on the other hand, Rosneft, is a Russian state-controlled company. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
His decision, Laster said, “clarifies that corporate officers owe a duty of oversight,” citing extensive Delaware authority that corporate officers owe the same fiduciary duties as corporate directors, and adding that “the fact that corporate officers owe a duty of oversight does not foreclose officers from owing a similar duty. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 4:37 pm
We responded to that danger at the time by prohibiting any bank from acquiring more than a 10% market share in deposits -- which was huge already. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:04 am by Katherine Morris
On 8 March 2024, Judge Russell SC delivered judgment in SafeWork NSW v Miller Logistics Pty Ltd; SafeWork NSW v Mitchell Doble [2024] NSWDC 58 (Doble). [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
However, the present position in law is already in effect (owing to the impact of Strasbourg jurisprudence) that the court would not make such an order or finding unless there were exceptional and compelling reasons why it was in the public interest for the disclosure to be made: see Mersey Care NHS Trust v Ackroyd [2008] EMLR 1 (CA) at [17]. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
Platkin in Heller v Lewis, 2015 NY Slip Op 51867(U) [Albany County Dec. 21, 2015], in which he denied preliminary injunctive relief sought by the majority-turned-minority faction. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 10:43 am by Lyle Denniston
  So, Alito responded, the Court might do what it did in a 1982 case, Northern Pipeline v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:41 am by Terry Hart
In Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:58 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Husband withdrew funds from this account to pay a portion of his distributive payment owed wife in 2006, and continued to invest in the account subsequent to the divorce. [read post]