Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 4,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2017, 9:21 am
Maryland and United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:16 am
The Second Circuit held in Davis v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:05 am
They had come to a rueful admiration of Justice Scalia’s lone dissent from the Supreme Court’s decision, Morrison v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 9:06 am
In 1981, in Rostker v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 2:00 am
At Casetext we’ve made real progress using advanced analytics to better leverage the wealth of content within the law to predict certain outcomes with more precision. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
Like modern votes of confidence, English history offers us limited guidance when it comes to determining the parameters for impeaching a U.S. president. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:42 am
” Susinno v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
In part, it reasoned that “a civilian spouse” should be entitled to recover the amount lost, regardless of earning capacity, other assets and obligations, remarriage, the former martial standard of living, or other 4320 factors. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
The problem is, just two years ago, in Walker v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
Yet those are precisely the things civilian review boards cannot do. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
The thrust of Rynearson’s posts was that the founder should be removed from his role as board member and de facto spokesperson for the Memorial because he used the lessons of the internment, and his role with the Memorial, to criticize Republican politicians (chiefly, President Trump) in many media articles or appearances related to the Memorial, but failed to criticize Democratic politicians. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:50 am
This is precisely what the arbitrator did. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am
Professor Ledewitz would have “us” change the laws in ways that “make sense” to “us. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:21 am
For some time, I have argued that the standards for conflict-of-interest disclosures should be applied symmetrically and comprehensively to include positional conflicts, public health and environmental advocacy, as well as litigation consulting or testifying for any party. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 8:25 am
Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 9:09 am
Talen Energy that could be used to restrict state initiatives to promote renewable energy. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court, in Washington v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:51 pm
In Duncan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
Proof of copying may be considered to be useful prejudice but it is no more than that. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
Proof of copying may be considered to be useful prejudice but it is no more than that. [read post]
