Search for: "People v. Herring" Results 1801 - 1820 of 23,804
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2016, 10:00 am by azatty
How ironic and wholly American is their story, therefore—as her husband went on to be the celebrated trial attorney who won the Brown v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
The reason the school owes Pupil C a non-delegable duty of care, according to Lady Hale, is because it has undertaken to teach her: “[T]hat responsibility is not discharged simply by choosing apparently competent people to do it. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
The reason the school owes Pupil C a non-delegable duty of care, according to Lady Hale, is because it has undertaken to teach her: “[T]hat responsibility is not discharged simply by choosing apparently competent people to do it. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:53 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee, on the other hand, alleged that Shore employs 300 people and argued that the court should use the Title VII test for combining the two companies to meet the statutory definition of “employer. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
For example, it has been held that late attendance for a school “session” may count as non-attendance (Hinchley v Rankin [1961] 1 WLR 421) and that the fact that a child had run away from home to live with her boyfriend, without informing her mother where she was, did not provide the mother with a defence (Bath and North East Somerset DC v Warman [1999] ELR 81). [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 8:13 am by Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP
Williams with her medical hormone treatment, which she had been taking for fifteen years to treat her gender dysphoria, intentionally misgendered her, and physically harassed her. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: The case of R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58Victim Fine Surcharges Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in four cases, heard together as R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58. [read post]