Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips" Results 1801 - 1820 of 3,828
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2010, 2:27 am
The faculty consists of IPKat team members Jeremy Phillips, Birgit Clark and Annsley Merelle Ward, who will be joined by Michael Edenborough -- who will be presenting the team's analysis of the new judgment. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:43 am by John L. Welch
There, the CAFC rejected the "reasonable manner" approach:Neither Phillips nor any other opinion of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, our predecessor court, or this court has endorsed the T.T.A.B. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 5:31 pm
  The problem may be how, in legal terms, the Court might fashion a ruling with that result — and nothing more — in the case of FCC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 8:51 pm
” This recalls Professor Mel Nimmer’s famous argument in Cohen v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:18 pm by admin
Craig Allen, 39 years old, and Phillip Walters, 56 years old, are facing criminal charges and surrendered at the California Superior Court upon the issuance of arrest warrants, DUI attorneys and the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 8:58 pm
But then there are the cases like that of Dark v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am by Amy Howe
  Other commentary comes from Phillip Pemberton at Ogletree Deakins, Shoba Wadhia and Gabriel Chin at ACSblog, and Spencer Amdur in The New Republic. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Phillips v Mulcaire, heard 8 May – 10 May 2012. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
, (Revenue Law Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 1-36, 2011).James Cleith Phillips, 'All of the Blood and Treasure': The Founders on Christian Legal Society Chapter of the University of California, Hastings College of the Law v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:38 am
  If you're interested in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion in Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
This one may take you a little while to get through, but it's worth it: United States v. [read post]