Search for: "SAID v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 2,880
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2013, 9:33 am
John Conyers Jr., (D-MI), ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee David Segal, executive director of Demand Progress Maggie Gyllenhaal, actor and activist Oliver Stone, director of The Untold History of the United States and Nixon John Cusack, actor and activist Wil Wheaton, actor and writer Molly Crabapple, artist and writer Jesselyn Radack, U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:27 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
Last December, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a first Office action tentatively rejecting all claims of the "Steve Jobs patent", U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
United States Dep’t of Labor Bull. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
* * * “In Furman v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:11 pm
It has been nearly four years since the Supreme Court set off a constitutional revolution in the financing of federal elections, in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:07 am
To its credit, the Supreme Court took only three years to correct itself in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 11:55 pm
United States, and this time Holmes dissented. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances --Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 1:12 pm
Just last year Justice Alito reminded us “that the autonomy of religious groups, both here in the United States and abroad, has often served as a shield against oppressive civil laws. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
The criminal laws stood on the states’ books well into the Twentieth Century, with the Supreme Court in 1986 in Bowers v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
V. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:44 pm
A Poisonous Affair: America, Iraq, and the Gassing of Halabja by Joost R. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 10:12 am
Kimberlin v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
The Ruling in United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
These together define a means of declaring law that remains influential in the United States. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 10:47 am
Both make the same basic point: The Constitution unequivocally gives the President of the United States the power to pardon anyone for any crime committed against the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 10:34 pm
This principle most often arises in church property disputes, where the Supreme Court has held that courts may not decide which faction in a church is the more religiously orthodox, but it also applies more broadly to prohibit the government from adjudicating people’s rights based on theological judgments (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
