Search for: "Scales v. State"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 4,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2021, 9:50 am
Witnesses underscored the importance of Section 13(b), noting that if the FTC were forced to scale back its litigation efforts, consumers would face more deceptive claims and states would need to shift resources to secure relief for consumers. [read post]
13 May 2022, 8:00 am
Notable Events of the Week: “The explosive leak of a draft Supreme Court opinion that would overturn Roe v. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 4:45 pm
Justice Frank Newbould of the Ontario Court of Justice in Trapeze Software Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
At what point along the juridical richter scale are owners of regulated smokestacks that release chemicals into the air immune from the very basic principles of property, tort and environmental law. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:30 pm
In summary, their Lordships’ view in M was taken as follows:Both the passages last cited emphasise that there must be a need for care and attention at the time of the provision of the supported accommodation, though in the case of a progressive illness, or physical or mental state which is liable to deteriorate without care, it can be a small-scale need at the outset. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
I think it would require this “state-specific v. general competence” question to be addressed. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:40 am
Lost tourism and convention dollars will enlist powerful allies in-state for scaling back or repealing the law. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:06 am
See Volusia County v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 9:26 am
It was a small scale event held to facilitate discussion between judges, practitioners, court staff and academics, held under Chatham House rules. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
Trump v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 8:00 am
United States - see S2KM's Murphy wiki Arkansas DHS v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:30 am
In Knox Couty v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
Serra v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
In Biomedino, LLC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 2:07 pm
Consent to jurisdiction, which is a required element of a counter-notice under section 512(g)(3)(D), is a meaningful legal concession, and is particularly problematic for users who do not reside in the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 9:40 am
. * After II Movie, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
Part V concludes. [read post]
Justices will revisit whether certain noncitizens in lengthy detention are entitled to bond hearings
10 Jan 2022, 9:40 am
In search of safety, he returned to the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 7:36 am
” In those states, one must hope that state courts enforcing their own constitutions—the United States constitution is one of only 51 in the entire United States, and the other 50 constitutions all differ from the United States Constitution in important ways—to preclude partisan gerrymandering. [read post]
