Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 7,501
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am
The actor imbues the character with originality. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:15 am
Almost everyone who ever was, had or has a child probably knows Bowser, the character from many Nintendo games. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 7:24 am
Alston and American Athletic Conference v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:56 am
In Gideon v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:41 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From today’s State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:32 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM stated that the… [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 4:32 pm
She stated that “regrettably, the majority agreed with the respondent state that the applicant companies’ activities did not fall within the exception for the purposes of journalism in the Personal Data Act” and that this can lead to an interpretation “that journalists are so limited in processing data that the entire journalistic activity becomes futile (..), particularly in the light of the dynamic and evolving character of media”. [read post]
22 May 2017, 10:03 am
Compare, e.g., United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 6:30 am
Marshall v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:51 am
A number of state legislatures are passing or at least considering new legislation to give businesses the right to refuse to deal with customers based on religious objections to the customers’ character or lifestyle. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 8:40 am
United States, 234 U.S. 600 (1914); see also JTC Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 8:49 am
” (United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
Ali v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 11:43 am
Taniguchi v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:47 am
See also Snyder v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
For Children Services v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
Trademark law states that "[a] product's color standing alone may qualify for trademark protection.Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
