Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 1801 - 1820 of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2019, 5:11 am by Tarek Maalouf
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, which upheld Fourth Amendment unreasonable search and seizure restrictions on domestic surveillance. [read post]
The district court granted summary judgment (dismissal without a trial) to the schools by applying the ministerial exception, a doctrine related to the First Amendment that prevents government interference in religious organizations’ ability to hire and fire employees. [read post]
The district court granted summary judgment (dismissal without a trial) to the schools by applying the ministerial exception, a doctrine related to the First Amendment that prevents government interference in religious organizations’ ability to hire and fire employees. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 2:10 pm
Hanson of the Iowa District Court, Polk County, ruled in Varnum v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 2:10 pm
Hanson of the Iowa District Court, Polk County, ruled in Varnum v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:15 am by Joy Waltemath
“Without a doubt, the questions involved in this action are serious and must be resolved by the proper authority,” the district court wrote, adding, “the Supreme Court will soon address these issues and provide much needed clarity for the lower courts” (Texas v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 11:29 am by Brian Sutherland
According to District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald’s decision in Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 11:29 am by Brian Sutherland
According to District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald’s decision in Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:00 pm by Steve Gottlieb
First, if allowed to fester, patterns of Court decisions can last for long periods. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:52 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
The Fifth Circuit had previously stayed a district court injunction against the law, but the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to vacate the stay. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 4:14 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In the published portion of a recent opinion affirming a trial court’s judgment, which denied a writ petition challenging an EIR, the First District Court of Appeal, Division 3, applied the relevant legal framework of the Supreme Court’s decision in Save Tara v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
All multi-district litigation (“MDL”) practitioners are aware of (and many rue) the Supreme Court’s decision in Lexecon Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
"On that basis, the Supreme Court basically held that Lexmark couldn't impose the restrictions it relied upon in this litigation, and that this wouldn't work for Lexmark even if the first sale occurred outside the United States (the one scenario of the two in which the district court sided with Lexmark). [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am by Phil Dixon
The plaintiff failed to state a claim for Monell liability against the city, and the district court’s award of summary judgment as to it was affirmed. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Samuel Bray
Circuit precedent, binding on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, vacatur is entirely accepted. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:56 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Relying solely on a criminal case citing a personal injury case – both of which dealt with minimum constitutional requirements for memorandum opinions of appellate courts to “state reasons for the disposition” (see People v. [read post]