Search for: "State v. Means" Results 1801 - 1820 of 61,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2010, 1:29 pm by Jason Rantanen
By: Jason Rantanen Fujitsu Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” (United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Choice-of-law clauses pose even more difficult questions when the state with the greater interest in the lawsuit has a strong public policy concerning non-competes.A stark illustration of these choice-of-law rules comes from the recent Fifth Circuit case of Cardoni v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 4:48 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
Department of State (“DOS”) has now issued FAQs for handling of same-sex spouses in both the immigrant (green card) and nonimmigrant (temporary visa) categories, following the Supreme Court’s finding, in Windsor v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 8:27 am by Dennis Crouch
United States, No. 22-53 Lakshmi Arunachalam v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 8:12 am by Hilf & Hilf, PLC
 This means that local governments are allowed to adopt the language of state laws or state codes and enforce those codes. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 9:38 am
A New York state intermediate appeals court recently upheld the “plain meaning” of a so-called “insured v. insured” exclusion contained in a not-for-profit directors and officers liability policy, but narrowly construed the exclusion. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 8:49 am by Nico Jacobellis
Hobbs on the State of Nature;The import of Corfield v. [read post]