Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Davis"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 2,078
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2020, 6:02 am
Before Brown v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:33 pm
The U.K. would be safer, they argued, because it would no longer be subject to the EU requirement of free movement of people. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm
Panelists: Bill Hearn, Davis LLP Canadian SCt decided Richard v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
(The feature was important enough to be mentioned in Article V’s amendment procedures. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 8:15 pm
Finally, the Sixteenth Amendment speaks of taxes on income.In United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:34 am
In Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
In Remix Without Romance, UC Davis professor of law Thomas W. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm
” The Washington Post writes that Yemeni rebels are posing an increasing threat to the southern area of Saudi Arabia as “thousands of mortars and crude rockets have slammed into schools, mosques and homes in Najran, a city of several hundred thousand people only a few miles from the mountains of northern Yemen. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
States have justified their constitutional critiques of federal actions by claiming for themselves the role of representatives of the American people, or at least, a considerable proportion of that people. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 12:34 pm
EFF, together with Daphne Keller at the Stanford Cyber Law Center, as well as lawyers from Davis Wright Tremaine and Walters Law Group, represent the plaintiffs. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
It does not, in our view, affect the substance of Article 25, which is concerned with universal franchise and the free expression of the people in the choice of legislature. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
., United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Evan Davis, Partner, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, and former Counsel to then New York State Governor Mario M. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:45 am
[MD-7] - 7/12/2007 Rep Davis, Danny K. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 8:57 am
[MD-7] - 7/12/2007 Rep Davis, Danny K. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 9:27 am
§ 7701(a); see MySpace, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
So they sought out people of color and low-income individuals, people with progressive values who had been ignored. [read post]
