Search for: "US Inventor" Results 1801 - 1820 of 7,112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2012, 3:58 am
If any readers have ever come across a collective agreement of the kind mentioned here, can they please let us all know? [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:30 am by Gene Quinn
To some he is a champion of independent inventors and small business community, frequent clients of his. [read post]
28 Aug 2021, 12:50 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
PatentsA South African decision to recognize an artificial Intelligence system (DABUS) as an inventor was one of most discussed IP news items of the last several weeks [see The IPKat’s posts on the DABUS saga in various jurisdictions here, here, and here]. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 4:15 am by Isaac
(There used to be substantive examination in Kenya, but this practice has stopped.) [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 10:00 pm
For more information or if you have questions, please contact one of our MVS IP attorneys or call us at (515) 288-3667. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 3:32 pm by Jo Dale Carothers
 After all, self-driving cars represent innovative progress in technology, and patents are intended “to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries. [read post]
25 May 2024, 8:23 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
§ 112, and contribute ideas beyond what the listed inventors actually explained in an invention disclosure. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 10:06 am by Jason Rantanen
But in many cases, the applications submitted by small entity inventors don’t actually turn into patents. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:32 pm by Vincent LoTempio
posted a press release using the highly publicized Supreme Court decision in Bilski v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:29 pm by Jim Singer
After the patent expired , the inventors filed suit for breach of contract. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 6:41 pm
Inventor's Eye: Inventor's Eye is for and about America’s independent and small entity inventor community. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 7:01 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Section 102(b) provides anexception for public use by the inventor not more than one year prior to theapplicable filing date. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:17 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Charneski issued public versions of Order Nos. 49, 86, 87, 89, 90, and 109 in Certain Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Using Tungsten Metallization and Products Containing Same (Inv. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 11:07 am by Avery Welker
Patent No. 5,110,046 (’046 Patent), relates to preventing abrasion on tie rail seats by using a plate designed to absorb abrasion between the rail pad and rail tie.[7] FIG. 1 below shows the abrasion plate (labeled 10) in between the pad (labeled 4) and the tie (labeled 1).[8] One issue in the appeal centered on the testimony of the ’046 Patent’s inventor, Hartley Young.[9] Normally, an inventor testifies on behalf of the patentee. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:23 am by Michael Risch
They note that with a different rule, some of these might have been converted to "public" sales upon more attention paid to providing such evidence.A related question is whether the inventor's actions can invalidate, or whether the AIA overruled Metallizing Engineering, which held that an inventor's secret use can invalidate, even if a third-party's secret use does not. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 12:21 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
The Guidance will assist examiners to determine whether a natural person’s contribution in AI-assisted inventions is significant enough to be considered an inventor. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:54 pm
Use it to search the 200+ posts since August 2006. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
***[IPBiz comment: Under AIA, we live in a first inventor to FILE world. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:31 pm
  The House version includes: a switch to the “first to file” system for determination of patentability; a section that permits assignees (rather than inventors) to file on behalf of the inventor; limitations on damages in patent infringement cases; a new “post-grant review” proceeding; and limitations on venue in patent infringement cases. [read post]