Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 9,109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2013, 7:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 9:28 am
In Reynolds v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
Citing Gordon v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:03 am
But Justice Kennedy may have taken the practice to new levels by using some of this information effectively to grant partial summary judgment to the party that lost in the court below. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 2:33 pm
Pa.) in Doe 1 v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:19 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:21 pm
The potential carcinogenic risks posed by incidental ingestion and dermal absorption from landfill soils were elevated for both workers and youth trespassers, but within the acceptable risk levels used by the EPA in setting Superfund cleanup goals. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:03 am
Baxter Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:09 am
"We do grant exclusive rights in exchange for disclosure. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
It is remarkable that a basic recitation of Washington v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
A third case to watch out for is Novartis's Aclasta (zoledronic acid) patent with Swiss-type claims for the use of zoledronic acid in a once-yearly i/v administration for the treatment of osteoporosis. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:26 am
At the Already oral arguments, the attorney for the US Government (Ms. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:05 am
The question before us is whether this broader conception of EPA's authority is within the power granted to it by the Clean Air Act. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:11 am
In Avendano v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
”Given AIRC, it is hard to understand how four Justices would have granted review in the Pennsylvania postmark case. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 12:40 am
The Texas damage award was then reversed in April 2021 by US District Judge Rodney Gilstrap who emphasized the question of whether the royalty was consistent with FRAND terms, leading to a retrial (Optis Wireless Technology v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
Ruckman v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 12:13 pm
FAPL v QC Leisure [2008] EWHC 1411 (Ch) and ITV v TV Catchup [2011] EWHC 1874 (Pat)). [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:39 am
The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Teletech, and Roe appealed. [read post]
