Search for: "United States v. Chang" Results 1801 - 1820 of 19,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2007, 5:41 am
Millett will argue on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of California. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm by Ilya Somin
  The Addison's Freeholder, No. 16 definition makes it clear that in half of the United States popular initiatives and referenda are legislatures, because they can change, repeal, and suspend.as well as to make new laws. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 12:28 am
FISA was designed to address the issues left open by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons On Monday, I blogged about President Biden’s first HR-compliance wish list, which focused on COVID-19 mitigation efforts. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm by Josh Blackman
Generally, the only route of appeal from a state court of last resort is to the United States Supreme Court through certiorari. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 105 (MI App., Jan, 22, 2015), a Michigan state appellate court dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies an inmate's objections to a policy change that called for prisoners seeking a kosher diet to receive vegan meals. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 8:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
United States Department of State et al. that software source could be protected under the American First Amendment, …the particular language one chooses change the nature of language for First Amendment purposes. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by Serena Mayeri
The Loving decision came at a pivotal moment in the history of race, gender, law, and marriage in the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:31 am
The Bottom Line: The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (the “BAP”) affirmed that a creditor failed to show cause to change the vote of a purchased claim in order to prevent the “cramdown” of a plan in a single-asset bankruptcy. [read post]