Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 1801 - 1820 of 6,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2015, 12:32 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Both the Virginia ruling and other similar recent decisions relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Region, 558 U.S. 67, 81 (2009) (quoting United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 11:48 am by Shea Denning
The Singleton Court explained that while the United States Supreme Court rejected decades ago the notion that a defective indictment necessarily deprives a trial court of jurisdiction, see United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:55 am by Eleonora Rosati
 On the basis of these principles the United States Copyright Office has a presumption against the registration of blank forms. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:48 pm
These are the articles from September: International: Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting XLIV Concludes with Adoption of Several New Measures, Decisions, and Resolutions United Kingdom: Intellectual Property Office Rules Artificial Intelligence Cannot Patent Inventions Israel: Supreme Court Rules Israeli Courts May Void or Change Choice of Law Provisions in Standard Contracts Between Global Companies and Small Businesses Japan: Children and Family Agency Establishment Act… [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:04 am by Amy Howe
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, who argued on behalf of the United States as a “friend of the court” supporting Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the only abortion clinic in Mississippi. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 12:32 pm
" A crack-powder disparity argument is rejected under United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm by Bartolus
301/06 Ireland v Parliament and Council [2009] ECR I-593, paragraph 64; United Kingdom v Parliament and Council, paragraphs 60 to 64). [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:24 am by Samuel Bray
" APA remedies is a huge and recurring question, and it has new urgency after the Supreme Court's cert grant in United States v. [read post]