Search for: "BELL v. STATE" Results 1821 - 1840 of 3,025
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Bell & Bell LLP: The website describes Bell & Bell as “Experienced. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog, Bernard Bell offers the last in a series of posts on Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am by Bexis
Ct. 1937 (2009), which formally applied to all cases (something we had always assumed would happen) its stricter interpretation of pleading requirements originally recognized in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:08 pm by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The CRTC has denied the Bell Coalition’s proposal for website blocking reforms which would have compromised net neutrality, Michael Geist’s Blog has coverage. [read post]