Search for: "Brooks v. Brooks"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 2,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2018, 7:34 am
Decisions, decisions . . .Paige v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Zilkha Chair in the Brookings Institution’s Governance Studies Program, where he serves as a Senior Fellow. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
The priority analysis in Nicocigs v Fontem may no longer be in accordance with the EPO approach to partial priority, but we probably need to see the reasoned decision of the EBA. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:01 am
Perhaps the most important exclusion from patentability, discussed further below, is India’s Section 3(d).The authors cited Pfizer v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 4:08 am
In 1895, the court held in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 8:28 am
Mo Brooks (R-Huntsville), filed an unusual lawsuit last week against the Census Bureau. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 5:00 am
See Wilcox v. [read post]
8 May 2025, 9:05 pm
In a recent Brookings Institution article, Mark MacCarthy, a nonresident senior fellow at the Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings, argued that current copyright law is insufficient to address the challenges that advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technology pose to the future of creative work. [read post]
9 May 2025, 9:05 pm
In a policy brief for the Brookings Institution’s Center on Regulation and Markets, Rayan Sud and Sanjay Patnaik of the Brookings Institution and Robert Glicksman of the George Washington University Law School argue that clean-energy permitting can be streamlined while maintaining federal environmental safeguards. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm
In a memorandum by Joseph V. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:04 am
Supreme Court’s June 23, 2008 decision in Sprint Communications v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 7:23 am
We also assist Chicago, Evanston and Oak Brook area used car consumers who are victims of fraud and consumer fraud. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 9:42 am
Por el contrario, hubo poco o ningún cambio en los estados que no se expandieron, lo que indica que estas tendencias fueron impulsadas por la expansión de Medicaid” (Brookings). [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:51 am
Lewitton v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:15 pm
Clair v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:28 am
He summarizes the legal issue as follows: The recent court opinion in Comcast v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s May 2023 decision in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 11:14 am
Sentencing Guidelines to Justify Limiting the Impact of Johnson v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 5:03 pm
Brooks (2015) 242 CA4th 715, 725, 195 CR3d 336, 344]; ► Communicating inappropriate sexual innuendo by text messages [Burquet v. [read post]
