Search for: "Commitment of M B"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 3,698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2011, 11:36 pm
That means we’re facing $1.2B+ (yes, “billion” with a “b”) in tuition increases just to stay where we are — increases of roughly $5,600 per student. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 2:43 pm
Maybe I'm missing something, but I have no idea how an as-applied challenge would even work here. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 10:31 am
" Ohio Revised Code § 2913.04(B). [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 9:23 pm
§ 1231(b)(3). [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:26 am
Thus, even though the employer was within its rights to fire him for insubordination, his single act of disobedience did not constitute misconduct disqualifying him from receiving unemployment compensation benefits (Paratransit, Inc v Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, July 3, 2014, Baxter, M). [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:36 am
I'm not getting into whether that is a good thing or a bad thing. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:00 pm
Read-the-whole-case rating: 2.B & M Handelman Investments Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:47 am
I'm guessing you'd say you're thinking of the children. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 12:57 pm
And I’m not even a native Texan. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 8:11 am
"If you are going to handle a case based on the fact a person committed a crime, transparency says they should have committed that crime. [read post]
30 May 2011, 8:12 pm
If “[m]en must turn square corners when they deal with the Government,” it is even more true that the government, including the courts, may not cut corners when dealing with man’s freedom. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:49 am
Aginah M. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 4:20 pm
Instead, he's being charged with conspiracy to commit cyberstalking, on the theory that his and his coconspirators' actions, were taken "with the intent to harass and intimidate" and caused "substantial emotional distress" (18 USC § 2261A(2)(B)). [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 12:07 pm
Fang, Arturo Casadevall, Elisabeth M. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
And I’m realistic. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:55 pm
Common bases for dismissing these questions—particularly that the President has the lawful authority to fire the FBI Director—do not fully answer the questions raised, because obstruction frequently involves otherwise legal conduct committed for corrupt reasons. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:55 pm
Common bases for dismissing these questions—particularly that the President has the lawful authority to fire the FBI Director—do not fully answer the questions raised, because obstruction frequently involves otherwise legal conduct committed for corrupt reasons. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 2:06 pm
I'm curious about the U.S. view on this, given the recent subsidies it has announced in relation to clean energy vehicle production. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm
If I’m reading this correctly, the ECHR is suggesting the whole inquiry into UNSC authorization is rather besides the point, since “treaty commitments and other agreements between States subsequent to the entry into force” of the ECHR just can’t alter ECHR obligations. [read post]
