Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 8,632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2023, 9:28 am
Both of these statutes direct when a juvenile case must be transferred to superior court (mandatory transfer) and when other cases may be transferred to superior court (discretionary transfer). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
While represented by counsel, the Shireys voluntarily bargained for and agreed upon a settlement on all issues of alimony, child custody and support, and equitable distribution, which was reduced to writing, signed by all parties and was jointly presented to the court and entered as a Consent Order in the Mecklenburg County Clerk of Superior Court on 24 May 2016. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
The Democrats then could sue Perdue in federal court, citing Bush v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
Foster sought a writ of habeas corpus from a Georgia Superior Court. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
Foster sought a writ of habeas corpus from a Georgia Superior Court. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
In Iliadis v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:54 am
Superior Court * Keyword Advertising Doesn’t Create General Jurisdiction–Rocke v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:06 am
Superior Court (1987), in this case because of the remoteness of the subsidiaries’ connections to North Carolina. [read post]
2 May 2007, 3:13 pm
The ILB has heard from several readers on today's Supreme Court decision in Ruth Mullins and Johnce Mullins, Jr. v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:47 am
A leading Canadian musical instrument retailer, Steve’s Music, has been ordered by the Ontario Superior Court to to pay more than $200,000.00 in damages, including $55,000 in moral and punitive damages, to a wrongfully terminated 59 year-old store manager with more than thirty years of service.In Altman v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:41 pm
This post examines an opinion from the Superior Court of Pennsylvania: Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
Last Wednesday, the Supreme Court held in Lamps Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 1:43 pm
Paramount Communications Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm
” This Court finds the superiority and predominance requirements of Rule 23(b) (3) are not satisfied. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:53 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
Last week, the court of appeals decided State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 9:50 am
Superior Court, 2007 Cal. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 11:53 am
Superior Ct. complaint filed Jan. 31, 2008). [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:57 am
On remand, it will be interesting to see what the state court does, given their recent approach of ignoring guidance from the high Court. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:21 am
The court held that the requirements of Rule 23(a) were met, but that the proposed class failed the predominance and superiority requirements of Rule 23(b)(3). [read post]
