Search for: "Does 1 - 38"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 4,958
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
Fair Dealing (1) Did the Board err in its application of the burden of proof? [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 1:09 pm
[Part 1: The feckless Tibetan government fails to prepare] March 10 is Tibetan Uprising Day, commemorating the heroic Tibetan resistance against Chinese Communist imperialism. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 10:17 am
E.g., Davis at 187 tbl.1; see also Dist. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:00 pm
In short, we reach the conclusion that the UK’s EEA membership will continue despite of Brexit unless the UK government chooses to also unilaterally withdraw from the EEA in accordance with Article 127(1) of the EEA Agreement – a step it is not obliged to take. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Sex offense recidivism rates Approximately 1-2% of adult males will eventually be convicted of a sexual assault, but this does not mean that they are all equally likely to repeat their crimes (Hanson & Bussiere, 1998; Hanson & Morton-Bourgon, 2005). [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 4:29 pm
How does the Process work? [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:50 am
Eli Lilly & Co., No. 1:07–cv–1133–SEB–TAB, 2008 WL 5384340, at *2 (S.D.Ind. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
Equustek Solutions Inc.[1] issued a preliminary injunction on November 2, 2017 enjoining Equustek from enforcing the global de-indexing order it obtained against Google in a British Columbia court. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
§ 5.05(1).) [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 8:51 pm
MN: Topsoil moisture 16% Very Short, 38% Short, 45% Adequate, and 1% Surplus. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
(Art. 38(1).) [read post]
29 Jun 2006, 7:59 am
Nor does it allow a state to keep in operation fundamental rules of its own legal system, no matter what the effect of these rules on the relevant rights. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:58 pm
Town of Lisbon, 78 F.4th 38 (1st Cir. 2023); Doe v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:06 pm
This scenario does not apply to nonsignatories. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 6:02 am
Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund, 383 N.J. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm
§§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e)(1). [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
" The subsequent turf wars over who paid for destitute asylum seekers arguably included such cases as Westminster CC v NASS [2002] 1 WLR 2956, [2002] UKHL 38, W v Croydon, A v Hackney [2007] 1 WLR 3168, [2007] EWCA Civ 266, R v Wandsworth LBC ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539, R (Mani) v Lambeth LBC [2002] EWCA Civ 836, and, of course, M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) and R (Zarzour) v LB of Hillingdon [2009] EWCA Civ 1529. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
" The subsequent turf wars over who paid for destitute asylum seekers arguably included such cases as Westminster CC v NASS [2002] 1 WLR 2956, [2002] UKHL 38, W v Croydon, A v Hackney [2007] 1 WLR 3168, [2007] EWCA Civ 266, R v Wandsworth LBC ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539, R (Mani) v Lambeth LBC [2002] EWCA Civ 836, and, of course, M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) and R (Zarzour) v LB of Hillingdon [2009] EWCA Civ 1529. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:35 am
If the Supreme Court ever does address Trump’s travel ban on the merits, I believe we will see some movement, however subtle, in this direction. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
First of all, they are insufficient, particularly for those of us who approach The Collaborative Constitution wondering why it is that her work does not reserve a major role for "We the People" (this is to say, why it does no reserve a major role for the authors of the Constitution, and the “demos” referred to in the very idea of “democracy”). [read post]
