Search for: "Does 1 - 41"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 4,707
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2011, 8:49 am
Issue 1: Did the City accept a non-compliant bid? [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:49 am
Issue 1: Did the City accept a non-compliant bid? [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
Canada (Minister of Finance), 2002 SCC 41 by Justice McVeigh in Fraser v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 5:30 am
The CISG does not distinguish between private law and public law entities and is not limited to contracts between private parties.[1] It is therefore applicable to sales contracts concluded by public law entities such as States if these entities do not act in exercise of their sovereign powers but iure gestionis like a private person could act as well,[2] irrespective of whether a public law tender procedure has preceded the conclusion of the contract.[3] The tender process that… [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 1:59 pm
The UT then went on to hold: The clause does not state that the premises are to be used as the private residence of the lessee or the occupier, but as ‘a private residence’. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 12:45 am
The grant of injunctive relief under section 37 of the 1981 Act in such circumstances does not constitute an “intervention” as defined in section 1(c) of the 1996 Act; section 1(c) is only concerned with court intervention in the arbitral process [41]. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 7:08 am
§ 41 et seq. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 6:15 am
Piper, 91 U.S. 37, 41 (1875); see also Dann v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:17 pm
For example, tenure decisions are communicated to the teacher in March of the teacher’s second year (faster than in 41 other states, according to page 10 of the decision), but the induction period does not end until May, and recommendations for credentialing come at the end of the induction period. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 11:44 am
All 50 of them. 1. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 9:35 am
In other words, until there are 50+1 votes to get rid of the filibuster, we will have the filibuster. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:32 pm
(In re Hardy (2007) 41 Cal.4th 977, 1016.) [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 10:35 am
W.R.C.P. 41(b) makes it clear that a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction is not an adjudication on the merits. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:15 am
In other words, a candidate does not lose his or her right under the RTI Act only because he or she has agreed to sit for JEE or GATE. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 1:49 pm
See Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Nov;70(2):439-41. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.07.014. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 2:02 am
But the court does not decide any other agency inconsistency claim. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:50 am
” (In re Marriage of Thompson (1996) 41 Cal.App.4th 1049, 1058.) [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:50 am
Detroit Bd. of Ed., … a decision of 41 years standing, was ‘wrongly decided and is now overruled. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 1:31 pm
Dames (1866), L.R. 1 C.P. 274 (Eng. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 7:53 am
Those remaining Trade-mark Regulation amendments will come into force on October 1, 2007. [read post]
