Search for: "Does 1-10" Results 1821 - 1840 of 41,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2014, 7:24 am
Footnote eight provides the process for understanding and applying the test:The FSTP-Test comprises the steps 1)-10):1) The FSTP-Test prompts the user to input(a) ∀TT.i ∧ 0≤i≤I=|RS| ∧ 1≤n≤N=N(TT.0): BADi-crCin;(b) ∀TT.0∧1≤n≤N justof: BAD0-crC0n is definite;(c) S0::={BED0-crC0nk|1≤k≤K0n, 1≤n≤N}:BAD0-crC0n=∧1≤k≤K0nBED0-crC0nk ∧… [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:12 pm by Adam Levitin
An arbitrator granted the request, but there does not appear to be any court order confirming the award. (10) Stormy Daniels brought suit in California state court seeking a declaratory judgment that the contract was void as unconscionable/against public policy and unenforceable because it lacks a signature from David Dennison. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
ENDNOTES [1] https://www.bakermckenzie.com/-/media/files/insight/publications/2024/the-year-ahead-report-2024.pdf. [2] See In Re Vivendi Universal, S.A. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:10 pm by Kevin Askew
  Instead, the Court adopted a new “clear test,” holding that Section 10(b) applies only to claims based on: (1) “transactions in securities listed on domestic exchanges” or (2) “domestic transactions in other securities. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:02 am by admin
When they are, the factor leans toward independence.[10] The degree of permanence of the relationship. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:06 pm by John Lewis
As we noted in our June 10, 2019 blog post, many have questioned whether state arbitration laws could be applied when some transportation workers are held to be exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) based on Section 1 of that act. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 9:30 am by Laura Bergus
Update 1/28/10: Mike Dahn, Vice President of WestlawNext Product Development, was kind enough to answer some questions about availability and pricing, and we’ve posted some screenshots. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
”[10] She noted, however, that SIFI designation is “only one of the Council’s tools and is not being prioritized over other approaches to addressing financial stability risks. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Federal Standards: This regulation does not exceed any minimumstandards of the federal government with regard to a similar subject area. 10. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Federal Standards: This regulation does not exceed any minimumstandards of the federal government with regard to a similar subject area. 10. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm by Sarah Grant
District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly’s order last month in Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:16 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Pinto Coelho v Portugal (No.2) ([2016] ECHR 296)(only in French) the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights held (by a 6:1 majority) that the imposition of a fine on a journalist who had published unauthorised audio recordings of a criminal trial was a breach of Article 10. [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
This means that even if the grounds in Section 14(1) for refusing specific performance, the court could still enforce specific performance. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:35 am by Broc Romanek
Does your company use a Rule 10b5-1 plan for corporate buybacks: - Yes - 58.1% - No - 41.9% 2. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 11:45 am by Unknown
The countries/regions include Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan.Journal issues/collections: Journal of Human Security Studies, vol. 10, no. 2 (2021) [open access] - Special issue on "Refugees/Migrants and Work and Education. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 1:59 pm
It does not constitute legal advice, and is not intented to create an attorney-client relationship. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 4:11 am
If Question 1 is to be answered in the negative, does such use of a Community trade mark within a single Member State as described above not in any instance qualify as genuine use in the Community as defined in Article 15(1) of Regulation (EC) no. 207/2009? [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:17 am by Dennis Crouch
Patent No. 6,319,006 (claims 1-8 obvious over two prior art references; claims 9-10 patentable). [read post]