Search for: "Does 1-54" Results 1821 - 1840 of 3,413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
  * Spanish Supreme Court asks: does compensation for moral prejudice tie in with lump sum IP infringement damages? [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 12:42 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
 The Act does not define what are essential services. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 6:31 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
So too does a recent decision by the county government: it is building the largest seawater desalination plant in the Western Hemisphere, at a cost of $1 billion. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Complete text of bill is below, but here are the bullet points:Conditions covered - Cancer, AIDS or Parkinson's DiseasePhysician certifies its use.Potency "the specific concentrations of individual cannabinoids that must be present to treat the patient's condition," Limited to a 30-day supply.Dispensaries  approved by county commissionFlorida Medical Marijuana - Complete Text of Proposed 2015 LawFlorida Senate - 2015 SB 528By Senator… [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Directive does not require proof of pecuniary damage, but it was held in Johnson –v- Medical Defence Union that the DPA does.) [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:31 am by Gritsforbreakfast
  You see within ½ mile of the jail are the following:  1 college, 1 elementary school, 1 daycare, 1 senior citizen apartment complex, and numerous neighborhoods. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:17 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
The conclusion of pretrial proceedings does not occasion entry of a judgment, and the order remanding actions to their original districts (assuming the actions had not already settled in the MDL court, as most commonly occurs) would not be the dispositive ruling challenged on appeal. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Brief for Petitioners 54–56; Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 31–32. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Brief for Petitioners 54–56; Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 31–32. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:00 am by Jan von Hein
 4(1) Insolvency Regulation and (2) whether this characterisation violates the company’s freedom of establishment pursuant to Articles 49, 54 TFEU 2. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 3:05 pm by Lucy Reed
To which the answer of any rational human being will be 1) as little as possible 2) as little as possible and 3) as little as possible. [read post]