Search for: "Dow Jones " Results 1821 - 1840 of 1,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am by INFORRM
Dow Jones ([2005] QB 946), which effectively requires the claimant to show more than minimal actual damage to his reputation, if his action is not to interfere disproportionately with  the defendant’s freedom of expression. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 6:53 pm by admin
Click Here EPA, DEQ have dioxin agreement with Dow Chemical Co. in place. - Tony Lascari, Midland Daily News, January 16, 2010 Federal and state environmental officials have signed an agreement with The Dow Chemical Co. that develops a path toward cleaning up dioxin contamination in local rivers. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Back in 2009 – when the blog was still a Bexis/Herrmann operation – we wrote a catch-all punitive damages post entitled (oddly enough) “On Punitive Damages. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm by Schachtman
The phosphodiesterases 5 inhibitor medications (PDE5i) seem to arouse the litigation propensities of the lawsuit industry. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599, a decision with significant implications for data protection law and practice. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm by Itai Maytal
The brief, submitted on behalf of The Washington Post, The New York Times Company, The Associated Press, Dow Jones & Company and 11 other news organizations, argues that the district court's ruling violates "both the letter and the spirit" of Gonzales and threatens to "severely undermine[] the continued validity of a journalist's privilege with respect to outtakes and unpublished newsgathering material. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:33 am by Mandelman
Let me see if I’ve got this straight… The Great Recession, or whatever we’re calling it, began in December 2007. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
In addition to the “threshold of seriousness”, the court can be asked to decide whether there is a “real and substantial tort” and, if there is not, to strike the claim out as an abuse: Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] QB 946. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:16 pm by Kevin LaCroix
That’s the benchmark’s most record closes in a year since 1995, according to Dow Jones Market Data. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
Dow Chemical Corp., 598 F.2d 727, 733 (2d Cir. 1979), the court took all of a paragraph to conclude that an FDCA violation could serve as the basis for negligence per se under New York law. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
As our readers certainly know, the learned intermediary rule holds that prescription medical product warnings are to be directed to prescribing physicians rather than to end user patients. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
Former leader of the Labour Party and Independent MP, Jeremy Corbyn, has vowed to sue Nigel Farage for defamation over Farage’s allegation that Corbyn subscribes to an antisemitic conspiracy theory. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’  This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
On 27 February 2024, judgment on meaning was handed down by Lewis J in the long-running litigation between the Dyson Group companies and the broadcasters Channel 4 and ITN, Dyson Technology Ltd & Anor v Channel Four Television Corporation & Anor [2024] EWHC 400 (KB). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm by Itai Maytal
The brief, submitted on behalf of The Washington Post, The New York Times Company, The Associated Press, Dow Jones & Company and 11 other news organizations, argues that the district court's ruling violates "both the letter and the spirit" of Gonzales and threatens to "severely undermine[] the continued validity of a journalist's privilege with respect to outtakes and unpublished newsgathering material." [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:57 am by Dennis Hursh
US Stock Market Performance after 1981*                                          5 Years                10 years             20 YearsAnnualized… [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am by INFORRM
In Vidal-Hall v, Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) the Court of Appeal dismissed Google’s appeal from the decision of Tugendhat J in which he declined to declare that the English court did not have jurisdiction to hear data protection and misuse of private information claims brought against it. [read post]