Search for: "His Law v. USA"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 3,297
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2014, 6:41 am
Sometimes patent holders don't want to license, and, under US law, patent holders do not have to license.Sadly, Rizzo really misses the mark in his textAs we noted in our Google-Nest deal analysis, there is certainly the possibility – even given the above patent issues Nest has uncovered – that Honeywell will win the patent lawsuit. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 7:04 am
The copyright wars will continue to be fought out in arenas such as TTIP.Blocking injunctions In my hard law piece I mentioned the pending CJEU reference in Constantin Films v UPC. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
ACLU v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:34 pm
District Court decision this week in Klayman v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:03 pm
The questions were asked as a part of Caronia v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:35 am
Lederman frames the issues in his first post and discusses the scope of the mandate in his second. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm
The judge stayed his order pending appeal. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 5:54 pm
As a result, the Chevron terminated Ion based on his "poor work performance." [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
The court explained that [a]t issue are two distinct uses of telephone metadata obtained from Section 215 [of the USA Patriot Act]. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:58 am
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:50 am
Penguin Books USA, Inc., 924 F. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:17 am
Don't forget to check out the Long-Shot Legal Challenges to Health Care Law in the USA Today.Phew! [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
Daiohs USA, Inc. (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 1286, 1301-1307 (Jaimez); Ghazaryan v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 11:39 am
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:30 pm
Abdo points to two concurring opinions in Jones v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 8:01 am
Subsequent courts and commentators have generally followed his caution. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:33 am
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Haugen dropped his appeals and his execution was imminent, Governor Kitzhaber was prompted to issue a reprieve, which read, in part: WHEREAS, Oregon’s application of the death penalty is not fairly and consistently applied, and I do not believe that state-sponsored executions bring justice; NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority vested in me by Article V, Section 14 of the Oregon Constitution, I, John A. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 6:57 pm
See 31 USC 3730(d)(3); see also Order Dismissing Relator in USA ex rel Schroeder v. [read post]
