Search for: "Hughes v. State" Results 1821 - 1840 of 1,957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Indeed, kids do a lot of copying that isn’t even noticed as copying: trace the letters to learn how to write; instruction where we have students watch then do, which is to say copy, then teach, which is to say have others copy you; perhaps this can often be distinguished as processes v. outputs, but copying letters is copying outputs, not just tasks. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:15 am by Peter Mahler
Blobel was a longtime professor at Rockefeller University, head of its Laboratory of Cell Biology, and was also employed by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI). [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am by INFORRM
Mulcaire alone pleaded guilty to five further substantive counts in respect of Max Clifford, Andrew Skylet, Gordon Taylor, Simon Hughes and Elle MacPherson. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
And the Court so held in an older case, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:33 am
Hugh Williamson: an express prohibition on ex post facto laws by states “may do good here, because the Judges can take hold of it. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Categories of Unprotected Speech The Minnesota law at issue in State of Minnesota v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Finkelstein, Basic Concepts of Probability and Statistics in the Law 86-87 (2009) (criticizing the blatantly incorrect interpretation of confidence intervals by the Brock court). 2 Zach Hughes, “The Legal Significance of Statistical Significance,” 28 Westlaw Journal: Pharmaceutical 1, 2 (Mar. 2012). 3 See Norman E. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:39 am
These include information on the applicant's race, religion, national origin, age, pregnancy status, marital status, disability, sexual orientation (some state and local jurisdictions), gender expression or identity (some state and local jurisdictions) and genetic information. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:51 pm
The significance of the case is that it no longer appears to be an implied duty under the orders, but an express duty.Some historyThe leading case prior to this was in Stevenson v Hughes(1993), a case in which the child did not go to see his father or speak on the phone. [read post]
22 May 2017, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
Were he still alive, Manfred would enjoy seeing Elk Point, SD, with less than 2,000 residents, become the stage for  Siouxland’s “trial of the century,”  with BPI v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:46 am by Harlan Cohen
The personality and experience of individual justices, hinted at in portraits of Justice Sutherland or references to international roles played by Jay, Marshall, Taft, Hughes, and Jackson, recede into the background. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This is according to the test laid down by the Supreme Court in 2017 in Ivey v Genting Casinos. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:27 am
In the wake of the UK Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis (IPKat post here), second medical use claims have received considerable attention from the IP commentariat. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 8:52 am by Howard Knopf
Second, it would appear doubtful that a paywall is strictly speaking a TPM, as stated at paragraph 31. [read post]