Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 1821 - 1840
of 13,489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
Small businesses generate negative externalities if they're exempted. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 5:59 am
" In re Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 227 USPQ 417, 424 (Fed. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 6:20 pm
Cir. 2019) (quoting In re Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc., 832 F.3d 1327, 1333 (Fed. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 6:04 pm
See In re: Foothills Texas, Inc. et al. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:21 pm
Takeaway: Though not cited in In re Skvorecz, the leading case on the meaning of EACH is ResQNet.com, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 3:30 pm
In re AstraZeneca Sec. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 3:41 am
It was 2014, and FedEx, or Federal Express as they’re officially named, refused to cooperate. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:58 am
Today we're going to talk about the history and background of the FDIC. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 6:39 pm
Think what you will of Barry Bonds and the state of baseball these days, the footage of him breaking Hank Aaron’s home run record will be watched and re-watched for years to come. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 6:33 am
Now we've read it, and we're applauding. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:30 am
In re Cesar R., supra. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 6:11 am
Lo and the recovery agent guilty of conspiracy to commit maintenance (i.e. the support of litigation in which a party has no interest without just cause).Ms. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:49 pm
The defendants argue that only Justice Kennedy's concurrence (i.e., the "significant nexus" test) applies. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 8:05 am
“Hyperparathyroidism” was construed consistent with medical dictionaries as “increased (i.e., above normal) secretion of PTH by the parathyroid gland. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:30 pm
Individuals with "blue card" status would be eligible to adjust to lawful permanent residents (i.e., receive green cards) upon a showing of continued agricultural employment as specified in the Bill. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
NB: The English version was the same for the B1 and the B9 documents.The “opponent” filed an opposition against the patent on December 18, 2008, i.e. almost nine months after the publication of the corrected specification. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:50 pm
(The feature involving mobile phones is currently only for the U.S. but they’re working on Canada, we’re told.) [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 10:00 am
Here's something that you really should read if you're interested in the business of intellectual property. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:15 am
In re Vitro, S.A.B de C.V v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 11:30 am
As a result, we vacate the injunction and damages award.There was a different claim construction between the USPTO in re-exam and a district court:In response, Marine Polymer argued to the PTO that “the [district court’s] interpretation of the term ‘biocompatible’ should be adopted in this reexamination” (i.e., that “biocompatible” should be construed to mean “no detectable biological reactivity”). [read post]
