Search for: "In the Matter of: Graham" Results 1821 - 1840 of 2,073
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2010, 12:07 am
The Oyster Case: Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
Summary of conclusions reached 5‑year prescription:  awareness of loss, sections 11(3) and 6(4) [5]        While it is possible that losses which were easily identifiable by HC may have occurred in 2007, leading to the triggering of the 5‑year prescription in 2007 (i.e. more than five years before the actions were raised in 2014:  see paragraphs [58] to [61] below), this is a matter of dispute which cannot be resolved on the… [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 As many have noted, our own era is not an age where the proclivity to compromise is applauded, and it remains to be seen if a Democratic Congress can figure out a way to "check and balance" a President who has exhibited exemplary skills in bringing his political party to heel and making such figures as Lindsay Graham or Mitch McConnell "useful idiots" for his aggrandizing views of presidential power. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The idea of same-sex marriage would simply not have occurred as a possibility to the Founders, or for that matter to the generations preceding or following them.So is there a way in which Justice Alito’s remark might make more sense, perhaps by focusing on a general analysis of how the law should treat harm, rather than the Harm Principle? [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
The year 2019 is ending with the great rifts--opened in 2016, exposed in 2017, and acquiring a greater urgency and revealing the power of its consequences in 2018--now exposed. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 6:05 am by Chris Mirasola
He claimed that this was “a matter of courtesy, and the oriental way. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Maybe some fears are legit with guns, but expect the sky is falling narrative no matter what. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 5:30 am by Chris Mirasola
Euan Graham at The Interpreter critiqued the Japanese-Australian deal as falling “substantially short of the relationship’s potential. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am by Sarah Grant, Jack Goldsmith
Lindsey Graham, one of the Senate’s most knowledgeable military experts, about U.S. global counterterrorism operations last October. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:25 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
., 322 F.3d 26, 40 (1st Cir. 2003) (citing Graham v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:39 pm by Jon L. Gelman
It also confuses matters with “airborne transmission” to indicate inhalation exposure exclusively at long distances and does not consider inhalation exposure via the same aerosols at short distances.This artificial distinction needs to be replaced with up-to-date terminology [10], as advocated by the National Academies workshop on Airborne Transmission [11], focused on routes of exposure via a) touch, b) large droplets sprayed onto the body, and c) inhalation of small aerosol… [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
from Graham Smith The recent Donald Ashby (sub nom Ashby Donald) decision of the European Court of Human Rights has revived interest in the relationship between copyright and freedom of expression. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:09 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  [Why would ability to circumvent matter there? [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 6:04 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Conducing the typical Graham inquiry would be near-impossible because it would be so difficult to imagine in the abstract what a machine would find obvious (p. 37). [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm by Peter Tillers
Graham, Federal Practice & Procedure: Evidence, § 5214, at 265–66 (1978)) (emphasis added). [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 8:06 am by Ed Stein
As a practical matter—as became irrefutably clear in the Iran context—waivers can certainly have consequences, so it’s worth noting their presence in this bill. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Critical distance from work matters. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
When historians look back at the copyright worlf in 2017 (if our attention spans allow us to have roles such as a 'historian' in the future!) [read post]