Search for: "Jones v. United States"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 3,760
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
But in 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:10 am
App. 1984); Jones v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:30 am
Here is the abstract:Both the majority and concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
Robert V. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
Also, King involves privacy in new technologies The nine-to-zero vote in the recent GPS decision, United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am
Duncan/Jones Day Designated Professor of Law at Ohio State University Moritz College of Law and Senior Fellow at Election Law @ Moritz. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:55 am
See Dow Jones & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 10:16 am
Jones, 80 U.S. 679, 733 (1872)); Dean v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
On occasion, the Court-appointed amicus actually carries the day — most famously in Bob Jones University v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 10:01 am
Jones, No. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 10:01 am
Jones, No. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:35 pm
Back in August 2012, we reported on how the American Civil Liberties Union was compelling the FBI to fully disclose how it interprets the results of the United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:32 am
The second memo, dated July 2012, is titled “Guidance Regarding the Application of United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:02 pm
United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 6:16 pm
The first is Real-time and Historic Location Surveillance after United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:37 am
Jones, 475 F.3d 292, 311–12 (6th Cir.2007); see also French v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 6:12 am
Jones - As with most court decisions, the facts of US. v Jones are critical in understanding the importance and the reach of the Supreme Court's decision. [read post]
