Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 1821 - 1840 of 20,070
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The board however considers that the interpretation of Article 54(2) EPC given in T 172/03 is incorrect. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The board however considers that the interpretation of Article 54(2) EPC given in T 172/03 is incorrect. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 11:13 am by Chuck Rosenberg
When Companies A and B propose a merger and are investigated, despite market factors that should not normally trigger Antitrust Division review, what do Companies C and D see, think and do? [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 5:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The little matter of an election usually gets in the way of the ordinary business of making laws, and the recommendations for creating them. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
What if we ask whether there really is or ought to be judicial supremacy even in matters of statutory interpretation? [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 3:53 am by SHG
Does it matter to a majority of black people? [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:46 am by David B. Kopel
Spreen, The Future Shire Reeve--Tribune of the People, in Crime and Justice in America 43, 45 (John T. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:04 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The specific requirement of R 42(1)(e) that the description shall describe in detail at least one way of carrying out the invention claimed is, according to established jurisprudence, sufficiently fulfilled only if: (i) the disclosure allows the invention to be performed in the whole range claimed (T 409/91 [3.5]; T 435/91 [2.2.1]); (ii) the whole subject-matter as defined in the claims can be carried out by the person skilled in the art, at the filing date of the… [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 1:20 pm
Feb. 5, 2008), isn't an earth-shattering case. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:05 am by Alexander J. Davie
A second reason not to include non-accredited investors in a Rule 506 offering is that each non-accredited investor must, under Rule 506(b)(2)(ii), “either alone or with his purchaser representative(s) [have] such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that he is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the prospective investment. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 9:46 pm
He didn't jam it down our throats, he didn't say "look at me! [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 10:50 am by David Markus
§ 354(a)(2)(A)(ii-iii) & § 354(a)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  B/c we live in a democratic society, not b/c we have preferences for news. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 7:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Combination means that you can win your TM case and be entitled neither to an injunction nor to damages or profits b/c defendant wasn’t willful infringer. [read post]