Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 42,354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2008, 6:03 pm
One reason the rules often don't matter is because there is no practical method of enforcing them. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 1:27 pm
The court’s ruling is worth reading in full. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 9:27 am
Handling Employment-Related Matters in Pennsylvania Since 1991610-647-5027Gallagher Law Group, PC Malvern, Pa 19301 610-647-5027 E-Mail Questions or Comments to : jag@johnagallagher.com [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:00 am
Allowing employees to record conversations in secret, the policies explained, would deter employees from holding frank discussions about sensitive and confidential matters in the workplace. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:21 pm
In particular, evidence or convictions may, at times, be obtained at too high a price The post Entrapment Ruled Inapplicable in Canadian Terrorism Case first appeared on Robichaud's Criminal Lawyers. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 6:46 pm
The Court in this case has searched diligently through the facts and evidence to try and find if the weight of the evidence would substantiate a ruling by this Court that a burden of proof could be found from acts, circumstances and the entire history over a large portion of the decedent's life which would substantiate a ruling that she had actually and factually changed her domicile from New York City even though she might have been a resident of Wayne… [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 1:41 pm
" Each District Court can decide these matters for itself. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 8:40 am
Fifty-five years later, the Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
”Further, said the court, SUNY established, prima facie, its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with evidence showing that, while the plaintiff suffered from a disability related to surgery, he never proposed a reasonable accommodation that [SUNY] refused to make.As to plaintiff’s allegation concerning SUNY’s refusal to renew his term appointment, the Appellate Division said that SUNY had demonstrated, prima facie, that its action “not to renew the… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:23 pm
Through a host of legal doctrines (e.g., the harmless error rule and the prejudice prong of the Strickland test), the Court has repeatedly indicated that accuracy matters — convicted defendants do not get a new trial based on procedural irregularities unless there is a reason to think that the conviction might have been wrongful. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 8:00 am
The plaintiffs put on evidence that the new disclosure rule would require attorneys to violate the attorney–client privilege. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 8:00 am
The plaintiffs put on evidence that the new disclosure rule would require attorneys to violate the attorney–client privilege. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:27 pm
The district court ruled that section 18-14-7(h) is unconstitutionally vague, and that the City’s denial of the license in reliance on that invalid provision was arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 7:25 am
Since the Hy-Brand case was vacated, the standard reverted to the Browning-Ferris definition, and the NLRB decided to tackle the matter with rulemaking instead of waiting for a new case to decide on the issue. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 7:15 am
The site manager instituted an investigation into the matter. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 4:22 am
Evans (University College, London) has posted The New Consensus on Class Certification: What it Means for the Use of Economic and Statistical Evidence in Meeting the Requirements of Rule 23 on SSRN. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
Referring to studies, without qualification, as admissible in themselves is wrong as a matter of evidence law. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
Referring to studies, without qualification, as admissible in themselves is wrong as a matter of evidence law. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 7:30 am
Further, opined the Appellate Division, the action the Plaintiff sought was not a purely ministerial act, but rather an expressly discretionary act, requiring notice, an administrative hearing, and a finding supported by substantial evidence of violation of the relevant provision or provisions of law, rule or regulation. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 7:30 am
Further, opined the Appellate Division, the action the Plaintiff sought was not a purely ministerial act, but rather an expressly discretionary act, requiring notice, an administrative hearing, and a finding supported by substantial evidence of violation of the relevant provision or provisions of law, rule or regulation. [read post]
