Search for: "MAY v. USA"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 5,345
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2017, 11:58 pm
Two recent decisions show the various ways in which it is possible to win on appeal and the likelihood of such an appeal being successful.IWATCH - Apple Inc v Arcadia Trading LimitedArcadia opposed Apple's application for IWATCH on the basis that it was (1) made in bad faith because it was filed in the name of Brightflash USA LLC and later assigned to Apple, and (2) descriptive or devoid of distinctive character in relation to Class 9 (computers, software, electronics… [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
USA,Inc., 731 F.3d 1271, 1279 (Fed. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:45 pm
Murphy Oil USA from the Fifth Circuit, Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:29 am
Example of Bank Moving for Continuance after Trial Starts: the Serban case An example of this type of continuance was made by the bank in the case of HSBC Bank USA, NA v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
City of Joliet and Endrew F. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
First up is Turner v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:32 am
However, clearly, technological changes in DRM and similar methods may well require changes to the law in the not too distant future. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm
The Case: Seven Ex-felons v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm
The Case: Seven Ex-felons v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm
The Case: Seven Ex-felons v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:36 am
In Czyzewski v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:42 am
In Microsoft v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am
United States, in which the justices will decide whether mandatory statutory gun-sentencing provisions may limit a district court’s discretion under the advisory sentencing guidelines, and Manrique v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 9:10 am
Ono v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:04 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 1:54 pm
” Citing King v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:22 am
Hofmann v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:08 am
Bowring v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:03 pm
” Finisar Corp. v. [read post]
