Search for: "Matter of Thomas J." Results 1821 - 1840 of 2,763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am by Emily Coward
Ct. 855, 881 (2017) (Alito, J., dissenting) (“… voir dire on the subject of race is constitutionally required in some cases, mandated as a matter of federal supervisory authority in others, and typically advisable in any case if a defendant requests it. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
  [1]  This month we will continue our study of the classical beginnings of admiralty and maritime law by examining mighty Rome - what its legal system was like, how Rome's laws evolved and amplified the admiralty that came before them, and most importantly how Rome's influence on maritime legal matters influenced a wide array of modern doctrines from maritime tort and contract liability to general average. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 9:13 am by Eugene Volokh
"The inappropriate … character of a statement is irrelevant to the question whether it deals with a matter of public concern[.] [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
As a quantitative matter, what was copied was a rounding error. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Bruen, 597 U.S. 1, 36–37 (2022) (Thomas, J., for the majority of the Court); Bostock v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Google’s general counsel has said “As a matter of both law and principle, we disagree with this demand. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Mr Fox responded to the Claimant’s allegations that his criticism of supermarket Sainsbury’s support of the Black Lives Matter movement demonstrated that he was a racist, by callin [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by uwlegalscholarship
Ginsburg, Tom and Miles, Thomas J., Empiricism and the Rising Incidence of Coauthorship in Law (February 15, 2011). [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:17 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court Oregon: ‘Confidential’ accusation creates substantial controversy sufficient to exercise subject matter jurisdiction: Google Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 5:53 am by SHG
” Justice Judith J. [read post]