Search for: "Matthews v. State" Results 1821 - 1840 of 3,207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Wittman v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:50 pm by John Elwood
Matthews, 11-845, Kentucky argues that the Sixth Circuit failed to give sufficient deference to Kentucky state courts’ interpretation of Kentucky law, in violation of AEDPA. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:07 am by Jared Staver
Matthew Brumbelow, a senior research engineer at the IIHS explained that drivers should not be driving faster than 35 miles per hour with the low beams found on the 2016 Colorado. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 12:31 am
(hereinafter "Microsoft Fine") [12] Matthew Broersma, Microsoft to Immediately Comply with EU Remedies, eWeek Microsoft Watch, Sept. 22, 2004, http://www.eweek.com/print_article2/0,1217,a=141486,00.asp [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:16 am by Rosalind English
C- 310/60 Danske Svineproducenter  v Justitsministeriet – reference to the European Court of Justice (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling on the Regulation laying down standards for the transportation by road of live vertebrates – read judgment  Some people might disagree with the Appeal Court’s judgment that a life serving prisoner did not have a human right to more than thirty minutes’ daily exercise in the open air (see Matthew Finn’s post… [read post]
19 May 2016, 4:06 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Monday’s decision in Spokeo v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 11:35 am by Randall Hodgkinson
MinihanFailure to instruct on voluntary intoxicationImproper comment about "mug shot"State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:37 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
"  So reads the first line of today's 8-1 SCOTUS decision in the Snyder v Phelps case.By now, the story is familiar to all of us: Albert Snyder's son, Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder, was killed in action in Iraq. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 6:36 am by Andrew Hamm
” At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen discusses a “case with potentially national implications both short term and long”: Common Cause v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
They state it is “unacceptable to violate fundamental human and consumer rights in an attempt at serving more relevant ads. [read post]