Search for: "People v. Peter"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 1,932
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2016, 9:28 pm
But the Court’s 2009 decision, Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
In the 2005 case of Avery v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
Thus, prudent businesses and business people will undertake a separate risk assessment to determine what additional steps to take before the Bill becomes law. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm
I will pledge to this committee and the American people that I will engage in such an analysis. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 6:08 am
(See, e.g., Benjamin Careathers v. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
“I believe that the skill I have developed better than any other was surrounding myself with great people,” Mr. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
FDA Advances Program for Real-World Evidence February 27, 2023 | Blair Bean Robertson, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals FDA’s approach to evidence-based decision-making may not be addressed to the right people. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 4:44 am
It alleges that during the class period the defendants misled these investors by making false or misleading statement or failing to disclose that (i) Barclays engaged in a “systematic pattern of fraud and deceit” by using its dark pool to favor high-frequency traders over its other clients; (ii) the pools were promoted as offering investors protection from predatory traders, while Barclays instead courted HFT firms by charging them lower rates; (iii) Barclays falsely understated… [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm
“I’ve never worried a whole lot about what people think,&r [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
19 May 2022, 4:45 am
Our last blog entry, UPC: four reasons on why the PPA is not legally in force, published on 21 April 2022, seems to have touched a nerve, as attested by the unprecedented number of comments received, for which this author is very grateful. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
In addition, we will continue to follow the trial and appeal, respectively, in the complex contempt of Congress cases involving former White House advisers Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:05 am
Or the road may eventually peter out into nothingness. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:46 am
While other people seeking entry or residency to Canada have encountered nothing but a locked door and an unwelcome mat. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am
In the context of content moderation (and platform regulation more broadly), this can mean that rather than the flat on-off debates we are currently having (as with the debate over Section 230 in Gonzalez v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
We will also provide an anonymous reader poll to learn more about what frequency and type of content people prefer to receive. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
