Search for: "STATE v BUSH"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 4,538
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2015, 11:00 am
That was Judge Rosenbaum today for a unanimous 11th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:27 am
Bush) and five state supreme court justices (all nominated by Republicans). [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:12 am
Under a previous Court of Appeals decision in Cetacean Community v Bush, the court rejected standing for "…all of the world's whales, porpoises, and dolphins" under environmental protection laws as animals were not expressly included within the provisions. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:52 pm
Is dissatisfaction with the current state of Section 2 jurisprudence a good enough reason to warrant application of Section 5? [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:18 am
” Bush v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 10:38 am
The case is all the more striking because more than a century ago, in Jacobson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 7:35 am
Judicial reactions, formal and informal, to Gall and Kimbrough The weighty guidelines question after Gall One (of many) tough questions after Gall and Kimbrough Is Kimbrough as big as Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 7:18 am
A Prawfs public service announcement--over at the Law Librarian Blog, Joe Hodnicki writes:When the Supreme Court of the United States decided in Hamdan v. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 10:31 am
Then, abruptly, one of the most controversial Supreme Court decisions in U.S. history, Bush v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
Felony cases are randomly assigned to the circuit Judges.The Drug Crimes rule also states, "When a [Misdemeanor Drug Crimes] notice to appear, criminal report affidavit, or information is filed, the clerk will assign the case according to the following alphabetical distribution. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:15 pm
But conservative activists understood Bush's references to Dred Scott as a coded message that he would oppose abortion, because the pro-life movement has likened Roe v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 4:47 pm
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 8:25 pm
Bush. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 10:30 am
NSA and Shubert v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 11:55 am
Ct. 2183, 2192 (2020); United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:58 pm
Hepting v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:30 pm
But as Justice Kennedy suggested in Boumediene v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 1:09 pm
Bush, the Supreme Court held that even though Guantanamo Bay was not United States sovereign territory, it is “under the plenary control, or practical sovereignty” of the United States. [read post]
29 May 2010, 11:33 am
United States to Al-Haramain v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
And, of course, there's the infamous decision in Bush v. [read post]
