Search for: "State v Edge"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 2,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
United States Department of Health and Human Services , Case No. 6:22-cv-450-JDK (E.D. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:00 am
See Banks v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 12:44 am
The first ASI issued by a Wuhan court was in the Xiaomi v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:22 pm
Holmes), Nick Bunker’s An Empire on the Edge: How Britain Came to Fight America (review by proud Rhode Islander Neysa M. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 7:17 am
Many know her as the judge in the Apple v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Nev. 2012) (citing United States v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:15 am
The procedure in that case, Burnham v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:21 am
See Couch v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 2:40 pm
An interesting case about libel and science; I will quote from the magistrate's report and recommendations in Santilli v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 1:10 am
Chapter V of the Regulation authorizes public sector bodies and Union institutions, agencies or bodies to request access to data from data holders if they demonstrate an “exceptional need” to use the data requested. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
Such edge cases aside usual liability standards should apply. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
Thus, without guarantees that authors are actually informed as to the envisaged use of their works and the means at their disposal to prohibit it, it is virtually impossible for them to adopt any position whatsoever as to such use.All this said, a few days ago, the CJEU ruled in another case - Spedidam v INA, C-484/18 - that focused on similar issues to those at the centre of Soulier and Doke, with however the factual difference that: (a) the relevant rightholders are performers, and… [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Kirkland v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:21 am
KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) - at the end of May. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 5:24 am
What is the continued relevance in this context of the direct v. indirect taxation distinction? [read post]
