Search for: "THE FIRST NA" Results 1821 - 1840 of 2,405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
At first blush, the pending Supreme Court case, Fisher v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
I participated largely on the grounds that the "culture/wall of silence" was horrific...now I am feeling almost remorseful.Moreover, the student wondered in a remarkable burst of naïveté, "If the team captains volunteered, when first approached by the police, to give DNA and statements, why wasn't this first conveyed in the media? [read post]
27 May 2020, 2:17 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The first two were iAnthus Capital Holdings (a Canada-based cannabis-related business holding company) and Phoenix Tree Holdings Ltd. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 7:58 am by CMS
Earlier Decisions At first instance, the judge held that the English court did have jurisdiction to hear the claim. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
”Frank argued that the lay attitude towards law is naïve. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 8:59 am by Anthony Lake
Adam argues that Blagojevich was naïve in trusting others, including Rezko. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Its mistake was applying that minimal level of scrutiny in the first place. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:20 am by Neil Kinkopf
  First, I am sure the campaign will profess its opposition to “judicial activism. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Linda C. McClain
(Mitt Romney, with his “binders full of women,” seems sort of sweetly naïve by comparison to Trump, as does Arnold Schwarzenegger, with his misplaced Hollywood bravado that led him to call his opponents “girlie men. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Our naïve 1L student might think so, because that is literally what the First Amendment says, but everyone knows that such a reading is not only nonsense but has been uniformly rejected across the ideological spectrum from the very beginning of the country.Can Congress, say, pass laws prohibiting incitement? [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 12:04 pm by Joe Koncelik
HOW MUCH: Max Construction Loan: No max Eligible Costs: Engineering & design fees, construction costs, legal and inspection fees Application Fee: $2,500 (May be credited to Loan Fee) Loan Fee: .35% (.0035) of total estimated project, processing and closing costs OR $400 for loans up to $100 million; .00175% for loans between $100 million to $150 million; capped at $150 million Contract Interest Rate: Based on the higher of the comparable Treasury Note Rate or the comparable MMD AAA scale, plus… [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 5:16 am by SHG
  So someone searching for the First Amendment issues arising from, say, revenge porn legislation, and turn to, say, a law professor who has published a post directly on point in a credible news source. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 3:19 pm by Ilya Somin
     The post The January 6 Attack was an Insurrection appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 8:22 am by Schachtman
Greenland held forth, unfiltered, on Deborah Mayo’s web blog, where he wrote: “Glad to have finally flushed out Schachtman, whose blog did not allow my critical dissenting comments back when this case first hit. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:01 am by Emily Brennan
I don’t think they are so naïve and idealistic as to expect that all problems will be solved overnight once the authoritarian regime is ended. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:35 am by SHG
  It reminds me of how naïve I am, how hard it is for me to fathom why there is any need for this. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 11:40 pm by Bill Otis
"Both Mac Donald and Otis said it is naïve to think that such a move will not have a negative impact on law-abiding citizens and a positive impact on the criminals who wish to prey on them. [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 5:23 am
I don't think it's naïve to assume that most professors see one aspect of our job as standing up for our students when they need us, as long as doing so is consistent with our own judgment and beliefs. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:46 am by SHG
”  Ten years ago, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) published a groundbreaking study on the use of forensics in criminal trials. [read post]