Search for: "US v. London"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 3,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2023, 1:24 am
First, FTC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
In Re Nortel, the Ontario Ministry of the Environment proposed to use Directors’ Orders to force Nortel to spend at least $18 million on investigating and remediating chlorinated solvent contamination on properties long since sold, and no longer used by Nortel. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 6:47 am
” “At the same time, several prominent US law firms have set up their London offices as separate businesses that are ABSs, even if they have not used it to take external investment. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
”[17] The Use of Chat Rooms Several media reports have indicated that the regulators are, in part, investigating the use of chat rooms that are available via the Bloomberg trading terminals. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 8:31 am
The most prominent case in which an anti-suit injunction actually issued was Motorola Mobility v. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 5:30 am
That included participating in and supervising the recent U.S. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 7:28 pm
Justice Arnold from the High Court of Justice of London granted the website-blocking order in an impressive 266 paragraphs decision. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 6:25 am
The lawyers for the two organizations are Bob Corn-Revere, Ronnie London, Ed Rudofsky, and (my former student) Cory Conley. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
"Classic" Uses Not ImmuneIn County of Hawaii v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm
A summary of the judgment is available on Lawtel [£] Events 26 September 2018, Conference 5RB, T Savoy Place,London WC2R 0BL Please let us know if there are any media and law events which you would like us to list. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:56 am
Which as Hacon noted in DKH Retail at [55] isn't a million miles away from the maxim: "what's worth copying is worth protecting" (originally proposed by Peterson J in University of London Press v University Tutorial Press ("ULP") [1916] 2 Ch 601 at 610, which is sadly not on Bailii).Hacon set out the approach he followed in [88]. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:47 pm
During the copyright session, Jeremy Phillips [speaking in favour of extending permitted uses] and Professor Robert Clark [arguing for a more restrictive approach] will present both sides of the argument to limit copyright protection in the information age by the possible introduction of a US style doctrine of “fair use” instead of the existing “by exception” approach of fair dealing [though it's only a debate, and each might just have well been… [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 7:20 am
The England v Kenya cricket game is about to begin. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
In Yee v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:26 am
The test forwhether or not there is a “substantial change” in working conditions is a question of fact and will depend on the nature, as well as the degree, of change (Tapere v South London and Maudsley NHS Trust (2009) IRLR 972 ). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:26 am
The test forwhether or not there is a “substantial change” in working conditions is a question of fact and will depend on the nature, as well as the degree, of change (Tapere v South London and Maudsley NHS Trust (2009) IRLR 972 ). [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 12:52 am
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri (Warner Bros Discovery) regarding the most recent instalment in the Lidl v Tesco IP dispute. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
An authority for this proposition was Bowater v NW London Hospitals NHS Trust [2011] IRLR 331, where Stanley Burnton LJ said: The appellant’s conduct was rightly made the subject of disciplinary action. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
United States On 22 January 2019 the US Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up an appeal in Hassell v. [read post]
